Category: Global

  • Are Superhero Movies Still Landing?

    Are Superhero Movies Still Landing?

    The Marvel Cinematic Universe’s (MCU) long-awaited Phase 6 kicks off this month with Fantastic Four: First  Steps. Like most of Marvel’s recent movies, Fantastic Four: First Steps also features a star-studded cast, which includes Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach. The film is directed by Matt Shakman, a Marvel veteran, who previously directed Marvel’s WandaVision in 2021. Based on pre-ticket sales, the movie is predicted to earn massively at the box office. Despite this initial hype with pre-ticket sales numbers, previous Marvel projects point to a disconnect between their ambitious output and audience engagement, begging the question: Are we still as excited for big Marvel projects as we used to be?

    Dwindling anticipation is not limited to recent projects, as it affected the entirety of Marvel’s last phase, Phase 5, which came to be the MCU’s least successful phase in terms of revenue generated. Superhero fatigue is real, there’s no denying it, but certain box office successes make a case for the genre being an indispensable part of cinema that generates substantial viewership without sacrificing the craft of filmmaking. Like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, which was a remarkable attempt at exploring one of the MCU’s wittiest characters, Rocket, while successfully developing a dynamic group of characters and their stories.

    A few key reasons explain this decline in enthusiasm, particularly the challenge of keeping up with so many interconnected stories, complicated further by the dual system of series and movies. While it was smart to diversify into shows to adapt to the new OTT environment, the decision also hampered the complex Marvel plotline experience because audiences cannot keep up anymore.  Central to MCU’s brand is the seamless connection of different plotlines over time, but ease of continuity in viewers’ minds is essential for this to work. However, now, there are too many shows to consume, with most getting left behind in the “continue watching” sections of our OTT accounts. The sheer anxiety of consuming the massive volume of content in the Cinematic Universe makes it difficult for audiences to appreciate it.

    Shows allow characters to develop over multiple seasons, so when we transition back to a three-hour movie, the character journeys seem substantially less impactful. Remember Eternals? They were a group of ten superheroes that the MCU introduced back in 2021 with the expectation that audiences would root for them for approximately two and a half hours, only to leave them abandoned.

    The problem with character-building is also evident in instances like Yelena Belova’s character, played by Florence Pugh, who is now leading the ‘New Avengers’ (Thunderbolts*). Unlike her sister, Black Widow, who audiences came to adore even before she had a standalone movie, Yelena’s character was tossed around in a series with Hawkeye and the Black Widow movie, and then suddenly handed the baton to be the next leader.

    Established actors and big names now leading Marvel stories highlight a growing misstep for the franchise. The appeal of earlier characters like Captain America and Thor stemmed mainly from the fact that the actors portraying them were relatively fresh faces, stepping into their roles with almost a clean slate. These allowed the audiences to define the actors by their MCU roles.

    Today, however, stars like Florence Pugh, known for her role in the Dune series; Kit Harington, famous as Jon Snow; David Harbour, a fan-favourite from Stranger Things; and Pedro Pascal, who has become a pop-culture icon and phenomenon, headline Marvel projects. Marvel even brought back Wolverine, played by Hugh Jackman, so that the new Deadpool movie could primarily be not a cinematic success, but a marketing one. Marvel, which was once known for launching actors with unforgettable roles, is now feeding off actors’ stardom to fill theatres. Whether this reliance will pay off remains unclear, as viewers continue to find it challenging to dissociate characters from the actors playing them.

    Marvel’s plotlines have been subject to criticism, particularly for their generic protagonist-turned-villain theme, milked repeatedly with characters like Scarlet Witch in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, Hulk in Avengers: Age of Ultron, and Bucky Barnes in Captain  America: The Winter Soldier. In their defence, the infinite number of superhero movies released every year outside the MCU makes it increasingly difficult to stay original.

    In terms of originality, looking beyond the MCU helps put things in perspective, as a lot can still be done to keep the genre fresh. For instance, Everything Everywhere All at  Once was a unique take on the previously explored metaphor of mothers as superheroes. The animated movie series The Incredibles remains highly entertaining, even though a similar concept was previously explored in Fantastic Four. Moreover, classics like The Dark  Knight trilogy continue to be loved because the movies explore real-world themes using their heroes and villains as funnels to make arguments, and not the other way around. Watching the three Spider-Men reunite was undeniably entertaining, but do we really need Robert Downey Jr. to return as a supervillain?

    Inclusivity and diversity, as demonstrated by the success of Black Panther, have been positive additions to the Marvel universe. However, does representation need to be as overt as seen in Ms. Marvel? Taika Waititi’s Thor: Ragnarok executed comedy brilliantly, but should Deadpool & Wolverine have relied so heavily on humour that the movie felt more like a 2-hour-long stand-up routine? The Marvel Cinematic Universe continues to grow, and its budgets, audiences, and VFX capabilities grow with it. They just need to be more selective and certain about the stories they choose to tell. How they tackle this will determine if the next phase sticks the landing.

  • Ozzy Osbourne, Prince of Darkness, dies at 76

    Ozzy Osbourne, Prince of Darkness, dies at 76

    Ozzy Osbourne, the heavy metal pioneer, whose chaotic stage presence, occult imagery, and the infamous bat-biting incident made him one of the most iconic figures in the history of rock music,  passed away on 22nd July 2025; he was 76.

    Known as the “Prince of Darkness”, Osbourne spent decades crafting his horror persona. As the lead vocalist of Black Sabbath and later a solo artist, he helped define the visual and thematic vocabulary of heavy metal. While critics questioned his choices and religious groups denounced and associated him with Satanism, Osbourne embraced his infamy with self-aware flair. His legacy lies not only in the music he made but in the boundary-pushing dark persona, which altered rock music forever.

    Born in a Graveyard, Adopted by Sin

    Born John Michael Osbourne on 3 December 1948, in Birmingham, England, Osbourne did not have an easy and lavish life. He grew up in a modest household alongside five siblings. Osbourne struggled with dyslexia in school, forcing him to drop out at 15. After dropping out, he had to cycle through a series of menial and low-paying jobs; he even served jail time for petty theft. Inspired by the Beatles, his passion for music set him on a radically different path.

    In 1968, he co-founded Black Sabbath. The 60s, known for its peace and love-optimism, was about to change thanks to its dark riffs and apocalyptic lyrics. Black Sabbath released their debut album, “Black Sabbath,” in 1970; the first song opened with church bells, and the eerie music set the tone. Osbourne’s ghostly, almost chant-like vocals became a defining feature of the band’s sound.

    Rock musicians like to play with danger, and Osbourne made it a central theme. Onstage, he seemed possessed, his eyes rolling back as he sang about ghoulish topics like war and mental torment. Offstage, Osbourne had a mysterious persona; he wore black capes and crosses, and spoke cryptically about the dark subjects he sang about.

    The dark image became legendary in 1982 during a solo concert in Des Moines, Iowa. A fan threw a bat on the stage- Osbourne assumed it was a rubber bat, and he bit into it only to discover it was alive. This moment sparked outrage, horror, and fascination across the world.

    Osbourne was removed from Black Sabbath in 1979 due to substance abuse issues, which paved the way for his solo career. With help from his manager and second wife, Sharon Osbourne, he released “Blizzard of Ozz”. He built a solo legacy rooted in the same horror and theatrical darkness that had made him famous initially, but with a clear focus and independence. Alongside his music, Osbourne’s off-stage behaviour became the stuff of tabloid fascination. He was infamous for outrageous acts like urinating on a historic monument in the Alamo while wearing his wife’s dress and snorting a line of ants during a tour. After facing accusations of him being a satanist and the Antichrist from right-wing Christian groups, he replied, “I’m not the Antichrist, I’m just a rock and roll singer with a dramatic flair”.

    His life took a turn in 2002 with The Osbournes, an MTV reality show that exposed a new side of the rock legend. Despite the previous perception of him being a terrifying icon in the 70s and 80s, Osbourne appeared as a fumbling, caring father navigating his daily life with confusion and gentleness. The show became a cultural phenomenon, and millions of viewers tuned in to watch it every week.

    Despite recurring health struggles, including Parkinson’s diagnosis, surgeries, and a well-documented history of addiction to alcohol and drugs, Osbourne continued to record and perform well into his seventies. He collaborated with artists like Post Malone and Elton John to make new music. He was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame with Black Sabbath in 2006 and received numerous awards, including the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award in 2019. Even though he had differences with Black Sabbath, he reunited with them multiple times. Just a few days before his demise, he performed a final show with them on 5 July 2025.

    Fans around the world mourned the death of Prince of Darkness, and said that his last performance was the “perfect farewell for their Prince.” “There will never be another Ozzy,” said guitarist Tony Iommi, his longtime bandmate in Black Sabbath, “he was the voice of metal and the heart of the band.” Elton John wrote, “Ozzy made madness into magic. We’ve lost a legend”.

    Osbourne is survived by his wife, Sharon, and his children, Aimee, Kelly, and Jack.

  • Debut Winners Galore: A review of Wimbledon 2025

    Debut Winners Galore: A review of Wimbledon 2025

    Sinner Redemption

    A month after their five-and-a-half-hour long explosive final at the French Open, Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner once again squared up, this time at Centre Court, to duel for the Wimbledon trophy. Alcaraz was gunning for his third consecutive Wimbledon title, while Sinner aimed to avenge his French Open loss to the Spaniard. Sinner had defeated last year’s finalist and seven-time winner Novak Djokovic in the semi-finals, while Alcaraz had the better of American Taylor Fritz en route to the final.

    While Alcaraz started strongly and won the first set, Sinner found another gear and won the following three sets with ease, winning the match with a scoreline of 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4. This was Sinner’s first win over Alcaraz since the China Open in 2023, the Spaniard being a constant thorn in the Italian No. 1’s side. With this win, Sinner extended his lead at the top of the ATP rankings with 12,000 points, while Alcaraz lost ground and dropped to 8,600 points, albeit still in second place. Sinner also became the first Italian player to win Wimbledon in singles.

    Swiatek Domination

    As is tradition on grass, the WTA was filled with drama and unexpected losses from the top seeds. Reigning champion Barbora Krejcikova went out in the third round to Emma Navarro, and by the time the quarterfinalists were decided, a first-time winner was guaranteed. After the dust settled, it was former World No. 1 Iga Swiatek and American Amanda Anisimova who made the final. Swiatek defeated Swiss Belinda Bencic in the semi-final, while Anisimova upset current No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in a tight three-setter to make her first Grand Slam final. This was the third time in three Majors that an American player defeated Sabalenka.

    Critics favoured Swiatek for being a five-time Major winner and boasting an unbeaten Slam final record, but still gave Anisimova a chance due to her excellent performance against Sabalenka. However, in a surprising turn of events, Swiatek swept the rug off under the American, winning the match with a scoreline of 6-0, 6-0, with Anisimova failing to win a single game and only winning 24 points throughout the match. It was only the second time in the Open Era that a women’s final ended with this scoreline, with German great Steffi Graf defeating Natasha Zvereva similarly in the 1988 French Open final. Swiatek consoled a tearful Anisimova at the net before celebrating the win with her team.

    With this match, Swiatek overcame her trophy slump since the 2024 French Open and jumped back into the top three in the rankings. Despite the devastating loss, Anisimova moved five places up to seventh in the rankings on account of reaching the final.

    Doubles

    The British duo of Julian Cash and Lloyd Glasspool emerged victorious at their home slam, defeating Rinky Hijikata and David Pel in the Men’s Doubles final with a score of 6-2, 7-6(7-3). This was the first time in the Open Era that a British pairing clinched the Wimbledon trophy, as well as being the first Major win for both Cash and Glasspool.

    Veronica Kudermetova and Elise Mertens won the Women’s Doubles after triumphing over Hsieh Su-Wei and Jelena Ostapenko with a score of 3-6, 6-2, 6-4, with Kudermetova winning her first Major title while Mertens won her fifth. In the Mixed Doubles, Sam Verbeek and Katerina Siniakova won a tight final against Joe Salisbury and Luisa Stefani, winning by 7-6(7-3), 7-6(7-3). Verbeek won his first Major title with this win, while Siniakova, the world No. 1 in doubles, clinched her eleventh.

    Image Source: Image credit: Iga Swiatek on Instagram

  • Elon Musk Launches America Party: Fiscal Conservatism, Electric Cars, Revenge

    Elon Musk Launches America Party: Fiscal Conservatism, Electric Cars, Revenge

    Billionaire Elon Musk, on Saturday, announced the launch of a new ‘centrist’ political party, the ‘America Party,’ which looks like both a political gamble and an escalation to his very public feud with US President Donald Trump. In a series of posts on his platform X, Musk has positioned the new party as a direct challenge to America’s historic two-party system.

    “By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party, and you shall have it!” Musk posted, citing a poll he ran on X. He added, “When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.”

    However, there is no evidence as of now of Musk formally registering the party with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). Musk, who was born in South Africa and is ineligible to run for president, has not named a leader for the party yet.

    The announcement comes against the backdrop of a dramatic public split with Trump, whom Musk had previously supported with over $275 million in campaign donations. Musk has even served in Trump’s administration as the head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), where he oversaw aggressive cuts to federal programs.

    Their falling out began after Musk publicly criticised Trump’s massive tax and spending bill, which the latter refers to as ‘one big beautiful bill’, which was signed into law last week and is expected to add over $3 trillion to the national deficit. Musk, a prominent leader in the EV industry, has very publicly made his opinions known on the bill, which omitted subsidies for electric vehicles, a key interest for Tesla.

    Trump has since then publicly dismissed Musk’s new party as ‘ridiculous’, calling Musk a “TRAIN WRECK” that has gone “off the rails.” Trump has also threatened to revisit federal contracts with Musk’s companies, including SpaceX and Starlink, both of which rely heavily on government deals. He further hinted at potential moves to strip Musk of subsidies or even reconsider his immigration status, despite Musk having been a US citizen since 2002.

    Unbothered by the president’s remarks, Musk suggested that the America Party could start by focusing on a handful of highly contested House and Senate races in the 2026 midterms. He argued that winning just a few seats could give the party leverage in a closely divided Congress.

    Meanwhile, a Reuters report has pointed to a slide of nearly 8% in Tesla’s shares on Monday, following Musk’s announcement. The company is now tasked with selling more than one million vehicles in the second half of the year to avoid a year-on-year decline in sales. If the stock slide continues, Tesla will lose over $80 billion in market value. Can Tesla afford this political venture, given how Trump’s initial threats to cut off subsidies to Musk’s businesses led to a $150 billion wipeout in Tesla’s market cap in a single trading session?

    Despite Musk’s confidence, US political history has shown little success for third parties. So far, the America Party looks more like a personal vendetta than a serious political movement. There are no declared candidates and no clear policies beyond Musk’s usual focus on cutting government spending. No known lawmakers have shown any interest in defecting to his fledgling party.

    In reality, there’s little evidence of a strong voter bloc eager to rally behind Musk. His millions of followers on X and strong financial resources don’t necessarily translate into political power. Without a coalition of committed candidates and grassroots supporters, the America Party risks becoming just another news headline, fizzling out entirely once Musk’s attention shifts elsewhere.

  • Diogo Jota, Portugal and Liverpool Footballer, dies in road accident

    Diogo Jota, Portugal and Liverpool Footballer, dies in road accident

    Diogo Jota, Portuguese footballer for Liverpool FC, died in a road accident on 3rd July, 2025, at the age of 28. His younger brother Andre Silva, travelling with him, was also killed in the accident.

    Just 11 days after his wedding, Jota was returning to England for pre-season. Having recently undergone lung surgery, he was advised to avoid air travel, so he planned to go from Spain to England via ferry. On their way to the port, while trying to overtake another car they suffered a tyre blowout, veering off the road before fatally catching fire. The crash occurred at around 00:30 CEST.

    Tributes poured in worldwide after the deaths were officially confirmed. Many of Jota’s Liverpool and Portugal teammates expressed shock over the news, reminiscing about their shared memories and recent success for club and country. Arne Slot, Liverpool head coach, remarked, “For us as a club, the sense of shock is absolute. Diogo was not just our player. He was a loved one to all of us.” Liverpool announced that they would pay his family the remaining amount of his contract, which ran until 2027. In their reunion performance on 4th July, British band Oasis paid tribute to Jota, with his picture appearing on screen when they performed ‘Live Forever’.

    Born on 4th December 1996 in Porto, Portugal, Jota started his professional football journey with Paços de Ferreira in 2013, becoming the youngest player to score for the club in the Primeira Liga. After playing for various teams like FC Porto and Wolverhampton Wanderers, he was signed by Liverpool FC in 2020. At Liverpool, he helped the team win the cup double in 2022, clinching both the FA Cup and the EFL Cup, as well as winning the league in the 2024-25 season. He was also part of the squad that reached the UEFA Champions League Final in 2022, losing out to Real Madrid 1-0. For Portugal, Jota made his international debut in 2019, contributing to them winning the UEFA Nations League twice, in 2019 and 2025. The 2025 win over Spain was his final match as a football player. He also made appearances for Portugal at the 2021 and 2024 European Championships. Overall, he earned 49 caps for Portugal.

    He is survived by his wife Rute Cardoso, their three children and the millions of fans whose hearts he touched.

  • A Costly Consensus: NATO’s 5% Defence Pledge and the Trump Effect

    A Costly Consensus: NATO’s 5% Defence Pledge and the Trump Effect

    In the 2025 North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) Summit held from 24 June to 26 June, a strong commitment was made by all the NATO countries. The member states have finally agreed to ramp up their defence spending goal to 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP) by 2035, a major jump from the previous target of 2% set in 2014.

    The US president has raised questions about NATO’s collective defence strategies for several months now, narrowly referring to Article 5 of NATO’s Alliance in his defense, which states, “An armed attack against one or more of the allies shall be considered an attack against them all. Trump has avoided explicitly endorsing the clause, claiming there are “multiple definitions of Article 5,” a move seen by many as an effort to avoid confrontation with Russia.

    In response, NATO has worked towards a compromise, agreeing to increase defence spending to keep the U.S. engaged in the alliance. The 32 countries have decided to dedicate 3.5% of their GDP to crucial military needs and 1.5% to other elements such as cybersecurity, infrastructure, etc.

    NATO has publicly stated that the alliance must work towards deterring Russia’s military force. “NATO needs a “quantum leap” in defence to deter threats to the alliance”, Rutte mentioned in a speech given in London, earlier this month. Thus, he urged member states to invest more funds towards defence.

    Trump went on Truth Social to share a message sent to him by NATO Secretary-General, Mark Rutte. In the message, Rutte acknowledged that Trump has driven NATO towards a very important global decision. He also added that Trump has “achieved something NO American president in decades could get done.”

    A New York Times report highlights that Trump has previously bashed NATO for not allocating adequate funds for defence, particularly in the face of threats like Russia. During his first term, Trump had threatened that the USA would exit the NATO alliance. Experts believe that Trump may be undermining NATO from within and that this dramatic agreement was primarily made to ensure that the USA remains an enthusiastic participant in NATO.

    Image Source: WhiteHouse/ @x.com 

    However, not all 32 countries were satisfied with this decision. Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez, had sent a letter to Mr. Rutte saying that Spain “cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP.” Sanchez insisted that Madrid would need only 2.1% percent of GDP to acquire and maintain all the personnel, equipment, and infrastructures requested by the alliance to confront these threats with their capabilities.

    As a result, every member state will not be forced to reach the 5% threshold; however, there are some standard military requirements that every country is required to meet. Trump vowed that he would make Spain pay for this “terrible” decision. “I like Spain … It’s a great place and they’re great people. But Spain is the only country out of all the countries that refuses to pay. And, you know, so they want a little bit of a free ride, but they’ll have to pay it back to us on trade because I’m not going to let that happen,” Trump said.

    This commitment was shaped as much by the strategic urgency felt by all 32 countries within the NATO alliance. As they rush to present a united front, a divide is forming within the coalition itself. As key participants like Spain are raising their voices against major players like the US.

  • Big Heels to Fill: Looking Back 37 Years as Anna Wintour Steps Down as Editor-in-Chief of American Vogue

    Big Heels to Fill: Looking Back 37 Years as Anna Wintour Steps Down as Editor-in-Chief of American Vogue

    Nearly 40 years and many a cultural revolution later, Dame Anna Wintour steps down as the Editor-in-Chief of American Vogue. Throughout her tenure, Wintour has been regarded as the most powerful woman in world fashion, with her signature bob and sunglasses becoming an iconic symbol of her influence in the fashion industry.

    While her reign at American Vogue began in 1988, Wintour had a long journey in the industry before becoming the Editor-in-Chief. Journalism runs in her family, as her father, Charles Wintour, was twice the Editor-in-Chief of the London-based Evening Standard. Anna’s career began in fashion journalism after she dropped out of college. By 1975, she was working as a junior fashion editor at Harper’s Bazaar in New York.

    In 1983, a conversation with Alex Liberman, the then editor of Condé Nast, got Wintour an open position at Vogue. After a bidding war that resulted in a doubled salary, she accepted the role, becoming Vogue’s first-ever Creative Director.

    As the creative director, Wintour reimagined the vision of American Vogue, breaking away from the traditionalist influence that Grace Mirabella, the Editor-in-Chief at the time, had brought to the magazine. She pushed the boundaries by bringing out more dramatic layouts and bold photography, which later earned her the position of Editor-in-Chief in 1988.

    However, before stepping into her role as the Editor-in-Chief at American Vogue, Wintour served as the Editor-in-Chief of British Vogue from 1985-1987, where she quickly earned the nickname ‘Nuclear Wintour’ for her bold and drastic editorial decisions. After her time at British Vogue, she moved back to New York to take over House & Garden – a Condé Nast shelter magazine which she famously renamed HG, filling its pages with high fashion and lifestyle features.

    Right from her first issue as Editor-in-Chief of American Vogue, the November 1988 issue, Anna Wintour made sweeping changes to the cover, which revolutionised the magazine. This cover featured 19-year-old Israeli model Michaela Bercu styling a $10,000 bejewelled Christian Lacroix top paired with a $50 pair of faded blue jeans in a candid outdoor setting. This cover, which featured Vogue’s first cover model styling jeans, was so radical to the magazine’s traditional style that the printer mistook it as the wrong image when he saw it for the first time.

    Wintour’s fresh remodel of the magazine birthed a new trend in the industry- the ‘high-low’ look, which, as the name suggests, comprises one high-end luxury item paired with a more understated, low-budget piece. From there on, her work has been pivotal in shaping the fashion magazine into a pop-culture powerhouse.

    Throughout her tenure, Wintour is known for having promoted the emergence of the supermodel era, giving names like Linda Evangelista, Cindy Crawford, and Naomi Campbell international recognition while also bringing emerging designers like Marc Jacobs and Alexander McQueen to the forefront. By featuring celebrities like Madonna, Oprah Winfrey, Michelle Obama, and soon stars like Kim Kardashian and actress Zendaya on the cover, Wintour also began the trend of celebrities becoming cover stars, which spiked magazine sales and reimagined Vogue’s identity.

    Her influence is not limited to the magazine and its widely known covers. As the lead chairperson, Wintour transformed the Met Gala from a museum fundraiser to one of the most anticipated nights in fashion, curating guest lists and themes with precision. Wintour has also received numerous accolades for her contributions to fashion and philanthropy, including the Order of the British Empire and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

    While Dame Anna Wintour steps down as the Editor-in-Chief, she is not completely exiting the fashion scene. She will continue her roles as Global Editorial Director for Vogue and Chief Content Officer for Condé Nast.

    Still, her last days as Editor-in-Chief are not without controversy. Her decision to feature Lauren Sánchez Bezos, media personality and wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, on what now appears to be her final Vogue cover has caused quite the stir online. The cover showed their high-profile wedding in Venice, with Lauren Sánchez Bezos wearing a custom Dolce & Gabbana wedding dress. Social media users are criticising Vogue for flaunting billionaires and are accusing the magazine of publishing paid covers, especially in the current political climate where there are growing conversations about wealth disparity and elitism.

    Now, the big question lies – who could fill the legendary heels left by Wintour? Online speculations are aplenty about possible candidates for the new job, but there is no official word on who will take over as Wintour’s successor. Whoever takes on the role of Editor-in-Chief of American Vogue will work under Wintour as she continues as Global Editorial Director for Vogue.

    Wintour has not been a mere leading force at Vogue – she has transformed it. As the industry absorbs this shift, one thing is clear: Anna Wintour is hardly leaving fashion. She’s simply changing its shape—again.

  • The World’s Largest Data Breach: 16 Billion Passwords Leaked

    The World’s Largest Data Breach: 16 Billion Passwords Leaked

    On June 18, 2025, the digital world was rocked by an unprecedented breach: over 16 billion login credentials were leaked online, drawn from at least 30 separate datasets. Cybersecurity researchers have confirmed this as the largest credential dump ever recorded.

    While rumours flew that major players like Apple, Facebook, and Google were hacked, Cybernews, the news outlet that looks into cybersecurity research, testing and data, quickly clarified there is no indication that this is true. As Cybernews expert Bob Diachenko noted, this “opens the doors to pretty much any online service imaginable,” not because the infrastructure was compromised, but because stolen credentials were tied to major platforms.

    Infostealer malware infiltrates devices—typically through phishing, malicious downloads, or pirated apps—and quietly harvests sensitive data, including stored passwords, session cookies, and tokens. This leak includes a large number of social media login credentials, VPNs, and other user accounts.

    This latest leak included everything from social media logins to VPN credentials and other sensitive account information. It doesn’t just affect a handful of people—millions around the world, especially in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, are at risk due to rapid digital growth alongside weaker cybersecurity infrastructure.

    However, there exist other perspectives. Hudson Rock, an Israeli cybersecurity company, said that its data showed approximately 50 credentials stolen for every computer. So, for it to add up to 16 billion, around 320 million devices would be needed. This number is highly unrealistic. The company also mentioned that the leak is not very dangerous, as a majority of the data leaked could be AI-generated or recycled.

    To counter the risks, experts across the security community advise taking immediate steps:

    1. Change passwords for any account you have reused elsewhere.
    2. Enable two-factor or multi-factor authentication or adopt passkeys.
    3. Use a trusted password manager to generate unique, strong passwords per account.
    4. Make sure to consistently monitor your accounts for unusual logins and enable security notifications.

    The credential leak serves as a stark reminder of the growing threat posed by infostealers and the importance of cybersecurity and digital hygiene. The sheer magnitude of the exposure necessitated prompt action from both users and institutions, even though the compromised credentials were not the result of a single breach. Now more than ever, it’s crucial to use strong passwords and watch out for signs of suspicious activity, like unfamiliar login attempts or account changes you didn’t make.

  • The People’s Pope: Leo XIV’s Path from Peru to the Papacy

    The People’s Pope: Leo XIV’s Path from Peru to the Papacy

    At 6:07 P.M. Vatican time on 8 May 2025, the new Pope was officially announced. White smoke rose from the Sistine Chapel, followed by the ringing bells at St. Peter’s Basilica, signalling the announcement. Clad in a white cassock and red cape, the newly elected pope stepped onto the balcony, where thousands had gathered, waiting eagerly for the declaration of a new era in the papacy.

    Just 17 days after Pope Francis’ death, Robert Francis Prevost was introduced as Pope Leo XIV — the 267th pontiff, and the first U.S.-born man to hold the title. Born in Chicago in 1955 to parents of Spanish and Franco-Italian origin. “I was born in the United States… But my grandparents were all immigrants, French, Spanish… I was raised in a very Catholic family, both of my parents were very engaged in the parish,” he said to BBC News. Former Archbishop of Boston, Seán Patrick O’Malley wrote on his blog that the new pontiff “has chosen a name widely associated with the social justice legacy of Pope Leo XIII, who was pontiff at a time of epic upheaval in the world, the time of the industrial revolution, the beginning of Marxism, and widespread immigration”.

    Pope Leo XIV grew up in the suburbs of  Dolton, Ill., just outside Chicago, where he spent his early years as an altar boy before he was ordained in 1982. In 1985, Pope Leo moved to Peru, where he spent a decade as a local parish pastor and as a teacher at a seminary in Trujillo in northwestern Peru, helping the Peruvian people recover from the devastating aftermath of El Niño.

    In 2015, Pope Leo obtained Peruvian citizenship. He referred to the country as “mi segunda patria,” which translates to “my second homeland.”

    Pope Leo XIV blessing a baby/ Source: Instagram/ @pontifex

    “Peru is rejoicing at the election of Pope Leo XIV,” said Archbishop Gualtieri, in an interview with The Vatican News, in the same interview, he also recounted Cardinal Prevost’s compassionate leadership during the difficult times of the 2020 pandemic, describing how Pope Leo was a ray of light and hope for the Peruvian people, which is why they are fond of him even today. “He would arrive and he was very, very warm with the people, especially the people of the Sierra to whom he would offer his help. He would deliver food and other supplies to remote areas, sometimes carrying sacks of rice himself.” Reverend Elmer Uchofen recounted to the New York Times. Pope Leo has always been and will continue to be a strong and outspoken supporter of immigrants and indigenous communities.

    Meanwhile, amid rising crises such as increasing inequality, climate change, global migration, violence, and protracted wars, the role of the Pope is more crucial than ever. However, the Catholic Church is wrestling with its internal struggles and conflicting views.  In recent years, a gradual rift has emerged within the Catholic Church, specifically between the Progressives and Conservatives. The Conservatives wish to regress to older mechanisms in the Latin Mass, while the Progressives appeal for more inclusivity in pastoral care. Pope Leo XIV’s moderate approach, blending traditional values and progressive leadership, may successfully lead to the reconciliation of opposing views within the Catholic Church and enhance its mission. Pope Leo is also most likely to follow a synodal fashion to lead the Church. Synodality is an inclusive approach of leadership in the Catholic Church, which encourages priests to partake in the decision-making process, ensuring that the diverse voices of the Church are always taken into consideration. He considers collaborative approaches critical to establishing unity and ensuring effective pastoral care.

    Pope Leo XIV has thus been labelled as ‘The Missionary Pope’ with years of missionary and humanitarian service under his belt. Near the end of his first General Audience given from the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica, Pope Leo XIV said, “The situation in the Gaza Strip is increasingly worrying and painful.” He also renewed his appeal for the entry of dignified humanitarian aid and an end to the hostilities, noting that the heartbreaking price was being paid by children, the elderly, and the sick. This public statement indicates that Pope Leo XIV intends to follow in the footsteps of Pope Francis, who frequently spoke out against violence and advocated for peace and compassion during times of conflict.

    Pope Leo XIV’s journey from the humble suburbs of Chicago through his missions in Trujillo to his first address given from the grand balcony of the Vatican reflects a pilgrimage that bridges different cultures, continents, and the evolving face of the Catholic Church. At a turning point for both the Roman Catholic Church and the world at large, Pope Leo’s life reflects a deep understanding of suffering, justice, and renewal; these qualities will guide his papacy in navigating the moral and spiritual challenges of the 21st-century church. As Pope Leo XIV enters a fragmented world and a divided Church, all eyes are on whether he can transform his missionary past into a legacy of reform and rebirth.

  • Dandyism Redefined: The Cultural Fabric of the Met Gala 2025

    Dandyism Redefined: The Cultural Fabric of the Met Gala 2025

    5th May 2025, the first Monday of the month, saw fashion’s most iconic night- The Met Gala, at New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art.

    The Theme

    The theme for this year’s gala was ‘Superfine: Tailoring Black Style’, inspired by Monica L. Miller’s book titled Slaves to Fashion: Black Dandyism and the Styling of Black Diasporic Identity. The book explores black dandyism and the use of fashion for self-expression and cultural resistance. Curated by Monica L. Miller, the chair of Africana Studies at Barnard College, and Andrew Bolton, the head of the Met’s Costume Institute, the dress code ‘Tailored for You’ encouraged attendees to tailor the theme to their creative interpretations, with the exhibit focusing on menswear.

    What is Black Dandyism?

    Emerging from the late-nineteenth to early-twentieth centuries after Emancipation, Black Dandyism is a cultural movement in which African Americans use fashion as a form of self-expression and a way to reclaim Black identity and the Black body. Tailored jackets, silk ties and fedoras are not merely stylish pieces of fashion; rather, they come from a powerful political movement in history that was paid homage to at the 2025 Met Gala.

    The Chairs for the Evening

    The evening began with the arrival of the lead chairperson and main organiser of the night, Anna Wintour, the Editor-in-Chief of American Vogue, and her co-chairs- Pharrell Williams, Colman Domingo, A$AP Rocky and Lewis Hamilton.

    Each year, the Met Gala’s carpet is custom-designed to complement the theme and colours of the night. This year’s carpet was woven by Extraweave, the parent company of Neytt Homes from Alappuzha, Kerala. Made from sisal fibre, imported from Madagascar, the carpet was midnight blue with white and yellow daffodils speckled on it. This was Extraweave’s third year crafting the Met Gala carpet, and this year’s carpet was crafted by 480 people over 90 days.

    Memorable Fashion Statements of the Night 

    Oscar-nominated actor and one of the co-chairs for the night, Colman Domingo, made a strong statement in a two-part Valentino look. He arrived on the carpet in a long, pleated royal blue cape with a statement gold sequined bolero. He soon removed the cape to reveal a black and white suit, a checkered blazer with a flower embellishment, gray pants, and a polka dot tie.

    Image Source: The Met / @YouTube

    One of the most talked-about entrances for the night was Rihanna’s, made special with the reveal of her third pregnancy in a custom Marc Jacobs corset dress-suit. The look comprised a black cropped woollen jacket, a grey bodysuit with a black pinstripe skirt and a hat designed by Marc Jacobs in collaboration with Stephen Jones.

    Shah Rukh Khan made his Met debut this year, being the first Indian male actor to attend the Gala.  He donned an all-black Sabyasachi suit, with a rhinestone-studded ‘K’ that stood out amongst his layered jewellery.  The finishing touch to the outfit was a cane crowned with a sculpted gold-studded Royal Bengal tiger’s head. Altogether, the actor’s look for the night paid homage to both Black Dandyism and his Indian roots.

    Also making his Met Gala debut from India was Diljit Dosanjh, whose regal look captured hearts from many. Diljit marked his Met Gala debut in a custom Prabal Gurung, incorporating his Punjabi roots in the Black Dandyism Tailored for You themeThe singer donned an ivory and gold sherwani, layered with a cape and a turban, along with a statement emerald necklace inspired by Maharaja Yadavindra Singh of Patiala. Diljit paid homage to his Punjab and his Sikh culture with an ornate kirpan (sword) in his hand and his cape detailed with a silhouette of the map of Punjab.

    Besides Rihanna, another baby bump was flaunted on the carpet as Kiara Advani made her Met debut this year. She came in a custom Gaurav Gupta, in a sculptural black gown adorned by an antique gold breastplate with ghungroos and crystals. The design symbolised a connection between mother and child, with Gupta describing it as “two hearts connected by an abstract umbilical cord.” Kiara Advani’s look was an homage to Andre Leon Talley, the late, legendary American fashion journalist and the first African-American creative director of Vogue.

    Zendaya made her return to the Met carpet in a custom Louis Vuitton suit designed by Pharrell Williams. Styled by Law Roach, her outfit was inspired by Bianca Jagger’s iconic wedding suit. The white monochromatic look was accessorised with a silver buttoned vest, a white floppy hat and Bulgari jewellery.

    One of the best-dressed attendees for this year’s Met Gala was singer-songwriter and actress Teyana Taylor. Designed by Ruth E. Carter,  the outfit was a near-accurate representation of the theme for this year. The burgundy red zoot suit look was layered beautifully with a dramatic cape. The outfit was accessorised with a matching durag, statement hat with a large ostrich feather and striking red leather gloves.

    Janelle Monáe arrived at the Met Gala in an outfit collaboration between Thom Browne and Oscar-winning costume designer Paul Tazewell. The custom-made outfit featured a stunning red, white and black trompe l’oeil dress and a monocle attached to a bowler hat. Her outfit also included a diamond brooch made out of 1800 Cristalino tequila.

    Diana Ross made her long-awaited return to the Met Gala following a 22-year-long hiatus. She walked the carpet in a sweeping white gown featuring an 18-foot-long train embroidered with the names of her five children and eight grandchildren. This custom creation was a collaborative effort between the singer, her son Evan Ross, and Nigerian designer Ugo Mozie.

    Drawing on the rich history of Black fashion, attendees embraced the theme by donning well-tailored suits paired with bold accessories, each weaving their creative interpretations. As the gala concluded well into the early hours, the 2025 Met Gala once again proved its place as a cultural epicentre — not just of style, but of storytelling and resistance.