Blog

Rekha Gupta was named as the next Chief Minister of Delhi as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) registered a landmark victory in the capital. Winning a massive 48 out of the 70 seats, the BJP returned to power in Delhi after 26 years.

In a similar fashion to the previous elections, the seats were divided between the AAP and the BJP, with the Congress failing to win a single seat. However, the parity between the parties completely flipped over. The AAP had won a massive 62 of the 70 seats last time out, but only managed to win 22 seats. Reports say that they managed to retain their Muslim and Dalit-dominated areas, but ultimately fell short to the BJP.

Major controversies in the run-up to the elections were factors which led to the BJP’s landslide victory. For example, outgoing CM Arvind Kejriwal was arrested in March 2024 for his participation in a money laundering case, after his government introduced a policy to bring in private firms and enterprise companies into the retail liquor sector. He resigned in September 2024, with Atishi Marlena sworn in. The BJP also criticised the official residence of Kejriwal, dubbing it as ‘sheesh mahal’ (palace of mirrors) and accusing Kejriwal of having a wealthy makeover of the house in excess of 50 crore rupees. While the AAP categorically denied these claims, it was against the ‘common man’ image Kejriwal had created for himself and contributed massively to the downfall of the AAP.

Freebies became a major tool used by both parties to attract voters from lower socio-economic groups. While the BJP initially criticised AAP’s policy, they brought out a similar scheme, a tool that also led to their victory in the Maharashtra state assembly elections, where they and their allies won a whopping 235 of 288 seats.

A major factor that helped the BJP was not directly related to Delhi. The new Union Budget for 2025 was released just days before the day of voting, with the new tax brackets removing income tax for people who earn less than 12 lakh rupees in a year. This massively boosted the party’s prospects within the middle class.

60.54% of eligible voters participated in voting on the 5th of February, albeit down on the previous elections held here. Exit polls predicted a victory for the BJP. The Election Commission of India announced the results on the 8th of February, declaring BJP as the winner by a landslide, ending the AAP’s stronghold in the capital. Major highlights included Parvesh Verma, son of former Delhi CM Sahib Singh Verma, defeating Arvind Kejriwal in the New Delhi constituency.

After a few days of deliberation and meetings between the BJP top brass, Rekha Gupta, who was elected from the Shalimar Bagh constituency, was named as the next Chief Minister of Delhi on 19 February.

In January 2025, Sanjay Roy, a civic volunteer with the Kolkata Police, was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape and murder of a 31-year-old trainee doctor. The crime occurred in August 2024, when the victim was found dead in RG Kar Medical College and Hospital’s seminar hall. The incident sparked national outrage and widespread protests demanding better security for women in public institutions.

Conviction and Sentencing

On 18 January 2025, Kolkata’s Sealdah court found Roy guilty under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; he was convicted under BNS Section 64 (rape), Section 66 (rape causing death) and Section 103(1) (murder). The conviction was based on substantial forensic evidence, including DNA matches from hair and skin samples, CCTV footage, and Roy’s contradictory statements of being framed. The CBI charge sheet alleged that Roy attacked the sleeping doctor in the seminar hall while intoxicated. A post-mortem later confirmed the victim was strangled to death and sustained injuries consistent with a struggle.

Despite the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) pushing to classify the crime as “rarest of the rare” and advocating for the death penalty, Judge Anirban Das sentenced Roy to life imprisonment until death, citing the need to rise above the “primitive instinct of an eye for an eye,” which the victim’s family disagrees with. The court also imposed a fine of ₹50,000 on the convict and directed the West Bengal government to provide ₹17 lakh as compensation to the victim’s family.

Investigation and Legal Proceedings

Initially handled by the Kolkata Police, the investigation was transferred to the CBI amid allegations of evidence tampering and mishandling by local politicians. The CBI’s investigation involved examining 128 witnesses, with 51 testifying during the trial. The specific actions of the hospital authorities and local police were also criticised, highlighting the need for accountability in such sensitive cases.

The victim’s parents were present at the court proceedings and claimed that other perpetrators were not punished and, therefore, justice had not been fully served. When told the state was to pay ₹17 lakh compensation, the family retorted, “We don’t want compensation, we want justice,” and indicated they will challenge the case in higher courts if needed.

The case also revived discussion about sexual violence laws. India’s 2013 overhaul of rape laws (after the 2012 Delhi case) was often cited by commentators, stressing the need for legal and social change. In Parliament, leaders reiterated the government’s intent to make punishments harsher and to improve police accountability (as Prime Minister Modi noted, the Supreme Court has rebuked police delays in FIR registration ). Victim advocates have urged better protection for women workers everywhere – not only in hospitals but all public workplaces – reflecting the sentiment “the nation cannot await another rape to take steps”.

Public and Political Reaction

The sentencing led to significant public and political reactions. Political figures, including members of the BJP and other opposition parties, criticised the verdict as a “travesty of justice” and called for a more thorough investigation into potential evidence tampering by local authorities. In response to the public outcry, the West Bengal government, led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, filed an appeal in the Calcutta High Court seeking the death penalty for Roy, asserting that the crime warranted capital punishment. The “Aparajita Bill,” which amends the criminal law to inflict harsher punishments for rape, including requiring the death penalty when rape results in death, was even pushed by the state legislature in early September, and she campaigned to enact the law, emphasising that the offender deserved nothing less.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke in parliament about the case, calling crimes against women “unpardonable” and praising new laws (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) for harsher punishments. He noted that the Supreme Court had criticised West Bengal for a 14-hour delay in registering the FIR, and assured victims that e-FIR provisions would prevent such delays. National medical associations like the Indian Medical Association (IMA) continued to press for reforms, calling for “airport-level” security measures in all hospitals and for doctors to be able to register police complaints remotely.

The case sparked mass protests in mid-August 2024 when tens of thousands marched under slogans like “Hang the rapist, save women” and “Reclaim the Night”. Medical students and staff across India held a strike; emergency services continued, but routine procedures were halted on 17 August by IMA’s nationwide shutdown.

Even after the recent trial and verdict, many junior doctors staged demonstrations outside the court. Immediately following the life-sentence verdict, doctors outside the courtroom protested that Roy could not have acted alone and demanded that all accomplices be caught.

The case has drawn parallels to the 2012 Delhi Nirbhaya gang rape incident, highlighting ongoing concerns about women’s safety in India and prompting discussions on legal reforms in handling crimes against women. As India continues to confront the layered realities of gendered violence, this case remains a point of inflection. It demands that hospital corridors be made safe, that survivors’ voices be heard without delay, and that justice not be left to the whims of public outrage alone.