discy

Category: Global

  • Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show 2025: A Runway of Reinvention and Representation

    Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show 2025: A Runway of Reinvention and Representation

    After a six-year-long hiatus and a comeback in 2024, the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show made a lasting mark with this year’s show, which took place on 15 October 2025 in New York City. This year’s show promised the familiar mix of glamour, power, and entertainment, with a renewed focus on diversity and inclusivity.

    Last year’s show garnered widespread attention for Victoria’s Secret, as the show made its return after being cancelled in 2019. However, this year’s show brought an even bigger rebranding, and with it, more attention. This year, the brand focused on broadening its representation, improving the show’s diversity and expanding its global outreach. Victoria’s Secret’s legendary supermodels like Adriana Lima and Alessandra Ambrosio graced this year’s runway alongside fresh faces from sport, culture and fashion.

    What Stood Out This Year
    This year’s lineup featured a diverse range of talent across multiple generations and backgrounds of models, reflecting the brand’s broader definition of glamour. The entire show was divided into six segments, namely First Light, Bombshell, PINK Halftime, Hot Pursuit, Magic Hour, and Black Tie.

    The runway featured a striking mix of veteran Angels and fresh faces. Among the show’s familiar faces were Adriana Lima, Bella Hadid, Gigi Hadid, Candice Swanepoel and Alex Consani.

    Supermodel Jasmine Tookes made a powerful entrance, opening the show while visibly pregnant. Her look celebrated birth and transformation as she donned a shimmering gold netted one-piece, adorned with teardrop-shaped gems, paired with a dramatic clamshell-inspired cape topped with pearly bulbs. The concept depicted her as the clamshell and her baby as the pearl.

    WNBA player Angel Reese made history as the first professional athlete to walk the show. She had two bold looks – a white lingerie set richly adorned with pink roses and a sparkly pink T-shirt with cut-outs.

    Beyond the models, the show’s performances embodied the brand’s global goals. Performances by music icons such as Missy Elliott, Karol G, Madison Beer, and K-pop sensation TWICE added a diverse cultural element to the show. One of the show’s standout moments was a creative mashup of the iconic 1981 Bollywood track ‘Tere Mere Beech Mein’ with Britney Spears’ hit song, ‘Toxic’ that played at the start of a segment as models walked onto the runway. Interestingly, this mashup came full circle as the signature string riff of ‘Toxic’ was sampled from ‘Tere Mere Beech Mein.’

    One of the most-talked-about elements of the evening was the brand’s inclusivity in design and casting. The model roster featured a diverse range of body types, backgrounds, and ages, which the show has previously been criticised for avoiding. Models like Ashley Graham, Paloma Elsesser, Precious Lee and Devyn Garcia, who are recognised for their efforts in promoting body positivity and inclusivity in the fashion industry, garnered widespread praise from online audiences.

    This year’s show also made a striking impact with its diversified presence of LGBTQIA+ talent. The runway featured trans models like Alex Consani, as well as queer and ally representation, including Quenlin Blackwell, Madison Beer, and Stella Maxwell.

    From the visual aspect, the show’s production spared no expense. It featured futuristic stage design, holographic projections, and couture wings made from sustainable materials. Themes of self-expression, resilience, and female solidarity replaced the pre-hiatus fantasy concepts of angelic perfection epitomised by sizo-zero bodies, flawless symmetry and hyper-feminine glamour.

    The Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show 2025 marked a defining moment in the brand’s ongoing reinvention. With a striking blend of cultural references, reimagined fresh designs, and symbolic storytelling, this year’s show positioned Victoria’s Secret not just as a lingerie brand but as a platform embracing change and inclusivity.

  • Rock’s ‘Spaceman’; Ace Frehley, Dies at 74

    Rock’s ‘Spaceman’; Ace Frehley, Dies at 74

    Ace Frehley, the famous guitarist and co-founder of Kiss, whose space-age persona, thunderous riffs, and electric performances helped define 1970s rock theatre, passed away on Thursday, 16th October 2025, in Morristown, New Jersey. He was 74. His family told sources the cause of his death was complications from a fall this year.

    Born Paul Daniel Frehley on 27th April, 1951, in The Bronx, New York, he was the youngest child among his three siblings. His father, Carl Daniel ‘Friebely’ Frehley, was an electrical engineer and used to play organ at the church, and his mother, Esther Anna, used to play the piano. Frehley grew up surrounded by music, but was inclined towards the electric guitar, which he received as a Christmas gift in 1964. He taught himself how to play the instrument; he often said that playing “saved [his] life.”

    Making of the ‘Spaceman’

    Frehley worked as a roadie for Jimi Hendrix when he was 18. After that, he began performing in local bands like King Kong, The Outrage, and Cathedral, until he saw an ad in 1972 for a new music band seeking a lead guitarist. The famous story of his audition, of Frehley showing up wearing mismatched sneakers, one red, one orange, immediately impressed the band; within months, Kiss was formed.

    Frehley was Kiss’s lead guitarist; he designed the group’s lightning-bolt logo and developed the “spaceman” persona, inspired by his lifelong fascination with science fiction. He painted silver stars around his eyes and, on stage, made his guitar smoke, spark, and sometimes shoot rockets. Frehley’s playing powered many of Kiss’s popular songs, including I Was Made for Loving You, Cold Gin, Shock Me, and Love Theme. His electrifying solo on Shock Me was written after he was briefly electrocuted onstage in 1976; it became one of rock’s most famous guitar riffs.

    In 1978, Frehley released his self-titled solo album, which went platinum and produced the Top 20 single New York Groove. A star was later named after him in 1981, a fitting tribute for the band’s “Spaceman”. He parted ways with Kiss in 1982 over creative disputes and personal struggles, but returned to music with Frehley’s Comet, a new band consisting of five members. Their debut album featured the rock hit “Into the Night.” Frehley’s Comet disbanded shortly after their 1989 record, Trouble Walking. He reunited with Kiss in 1996. Frehley performed with the group at the 2002 Winter Olympics before departing again.

    He resumed his solo career that included albums such as Anomaly (2009), Space Invader (2014), and 10,000 Volts, the most recent one, released in 2024. He was preparing to release Origins Vol. 3 at the time of his death. Frehley was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 2014. Frehley continued recording and touring as a solo artist until a fall in his studio in September 2025 forced him to cancel his remaining shows.

    Though described as an “unschooled musician”, Frehley’s influence extended across generations of guitarists. He performed with artists including Slash, Rob Zombie, and Tommy Lee; he even appeared in the hit sitcom Family Guy. His trailblazing guitar playing skills secured him a spot among Guitar World’s 100 greatest musicians.

    Frehley is survived by his daughter, Monique, and his former wife, Jeanette. Kiss co-founders Gene Simmons and Paul Stanley said in a joint statement, “We are devastated by the passing of Ace Frehley; he was an essential and irreplaceable rock soldier during some of the most foundational chapters of the band’s history. He is and always will be part of Kiss’s legacy.” Fans across the world flooded social media with tributes. Some fans said: The Spaceman has simply returned to the cosmos.

  • Atmospheric CO₂ Surges to Record High: A Major Shift in the Planet’s Climate System

    Atmospheric CO₂ Surges to Record High: A Major Shift in the Planet’s Climate System

    In a sobering reminder of the climate crisis, global carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and atmospheric levels have reached all-time highs, indicating a dangerous path ahead. Two recent reports from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the International Energy Agency (IEA) present a grim picture: despite significant advances in renewable energy, our planet is still releasing more fossil carbon than ever before.

    According to the WMO, atmospheric CO₂ levels increased by about 3.5 parts per million (ppm) between 2023 and 2024. This is the largest one-year rise since systematic measurements started in 1957. As a result, the global mean CO₂ concentration reached around 423.9 ppm in 2024, roughly 152% of pre-industrial levels. Meanwhile, the IEA estimates that energy-related CO₂ emissions reached a new high of about 37.8 gigatonnes (Gt) in 2024.

    So, why is this happening, and why is it concerning? There are three driving factors for this: an increasing dependence on fossil fuels, rising demand for energy sources and weakening natural carbon sinks.

    Despite significant growth in solar, wind, and other low-carbon technologies, fossil fuels still make up most of the global energy mix. The IEA reports that in 2024, emissions from fuel combustion increased by about 1 %. Meanwhile, emissions from industrial processes fell slightly, by about 2.3 %. Specifically, natural gas emissions increased by 2.5 % and coal emissions increased by 0.9 %. These figures show a complicated picture: although clean energy is expanding quickly, it mainly works alongside fossil-fueled sources instead of replacing them.

    The IEA calculates that about 80 % of the growth in emissions in 2024 is attributed to an increase in temperature-driven electricity demand. In India and China, record heat-waves caused dramatic spikes in power consumption, such as through air-conditioning and industrial use, prompting utilities to increase coal and gas-fired plants to cater to the demand. The WMO points out that the time was also when the 2023/24 El Niño episode took place, which pushed back the growth of vegetation and enhanced fire activity, thereby limiting the Earth’s capacity to take up CO₂.

    Arguably, the most dangerous indicator is the falling effectiveness of natural carbon sinks. WMO estimates that half of all CO₂ emitted by humans is typically taken up by land and oceans, but their uptake has failed in recent years. The chain reaction is worrying: warmer temperatures lead to drier soil and stressed forests, which leads to more wildfires and reduced absorption. This entire chain emits more CO₂ in the atmosphere, creating additional warming. Research indicates that the land-sink collapsed substantially in 2023.

    To reverse this alarming rise in emissions, the world needs to act decisively on multiple fronts. First, there must be significant cuts in the use of fossil fuels, especially coal and gas, for industry and energy production. New all-time highs for global yearly emissions show that we are not yet turning the corner, even though progress is being made. Grid/storage infrastructure, renewable energy, and other clean technologies must expand quickly to meet and replace existing demand. The heat-driven spike in demand emphasises how important energy efficiency is to reducing global warming. Energy efficiency systems need to be brought out, especially in buildings, transportation, and heating and cooling systems. Forests, peatlands, and mangroves are examples of natural carbon sinks that must be preserved and restored because their current capacity appears to be limited.

    The recent record in CO₂ emissions is not a temporary issue. While the shift to clean energy is happening, it is not fast enough to end our reliance on fossil fuels. Without a significant increase in efforts to reduce demand and improve natural carbon sinks, the warming we have already caused may result in climate changes that exceed our worst fears.

  • Diane Keaton, Oscar-Winning Star of Annie Hall and The Godfather, Dies at 79

    Diane Keaton, Oscar-Winning Star of Annie Hall and The Godfather, Dies at 79

    The iconic, Oscar-winning actress Diane Keaton’s demise is truly a great loss to global cinema. She was famously regarded for her extraordinary performances that combined humour, warmth, and quirky charm. She passed at 79 on October 11th at her residence in Los Angeles. According to family friends, Keaton experienced a temporary health decline over the past months.

    For over 50 years, Keaton portrayed some of the cinema’s classic American characters, realistic yet oddball, graceful yet clumsy, nervous yet fiercely honest, or any other combination. Her personality reflected quirky yet bright, peculiar yet familiar, and never strayed from her individuality.

    From Los Angeles Dreamer to Hollywood Legend 

    Born Diane Hall on January 5, 1946, in Los Angeles, Keaton was the oldest of four children. She was the daughter of Dorothy Deanne Keaton, a homemaker and photographer with a creative, burgeoning spirit that would later inspire her filmmaking and acting, and John Newton Ignatius Hall, a civil engineer and real estate broker. After high school, Keaton moved to New York to study acting at the Neighbourhood Playhouse, drawn to the feel of live theatre. Keaton made her Broadway debut in 1968 in the musical Hair, but it was her performance in Woody Allen’s stage play “Play It Again, Sam” that changed everything; it marked the start of a lengthy professional partnership and romance between Keaton and Allen.

    This partnership extended to the screen in films, including Sleeper (1973), Love and Death (1975), and Annie Hall (1977), which would ultimately be Keaton’s defining performance.

    The Birth of a Screen Legend

    Keaton’s transformational performance occurred earlier, in Francis Ford Coppola’s film The Godfather (1972) as Kay Adams, the moral centre to Michael Corleone’s ascent to violent power. Keaton provided emotional nuance to an otherwise brutal story, which became one of her artistic signatures.

    However, it was Annie Hall that vaulted her to instant stardom. The film was a bittersweet romantic comedy that Woody Allen wrote, produced, and directed, in which he starred, and that was about Keaton as much as it was about the movie characters. Keaton’s wardrobe of bowler hats, men’s vests, wide slacks, and ties was taken straight from her own closet, which made the look iconic.

    For this performance, Keaton won the Academy Award for Best Actress in 1978, and Pauline Kael of The New Yorker called Keaton “the most original screen presence of her generation.”

    Reinvention and Variety

    Throughout the following stretch of forty years, Keaton broke out of her generic shell and shifted to more comedic narratives alongside dramatic roles: the trifecta of Oscar nominations for Warren Beatty’s Reds (1981), Marvin’s Room (1996), and Something’s Gotta Give (2003) was a part of her new aesthetic.

    Her films were soon considered as an all-encompassing body of work: hits like Baby Boom (1987), Father of the Bride (1991), The First Wives Club (1996), The Family Stone (2005), and Book Club (2018) established her as the money-making element of both rom-coms and ensemble films.

    Keaton did not simply perform in front of the camera; she forged parallel careers in photography, interior design, and real estate. Her photography books and architectural restorations reflected a similar care with attention to detail and nostalgic representation behind the camera, similar to the emotional frame of her experience while performing on screen.

    A Life of Individuality

    Keaton never married and addressed that with her usual sense of humour. “I love the thought of marriage,” she told Parade. “But I’m much more suited for making movies than to be in long-term relationships.”

    She adopted two children: Dexter in 1996 and a son, Duke, in 2001, and described motherhood as her greatest role.

    Keaton’s personal life was interesting, but she lived in a way that allowed her to maintain her independence. Her personal life was often discussed in relation to her co-stars, including Woody Allen, Warren Beatty, and Al Pacino, but she ultimately preferred solitude in her later years. She was candid about her challenges with bulimia in her younger years and her long-standing battle with skin cancer, and spoke openly about both for awareness purposes.

    Tributes From All Across Hollywood

    The announcement of Keaton’s passing drew tributes from colleagues and admirers worldwide. Many personalities from the entertainment world honoured Keaton, including Coppola, Viola Davis, Robert De Niro, DiCaprio, Martin, Fonda, Kate Hudson, Demi Moore, Sarah Jessica Parker, and Reese Witherspoon. Allen wrote and published an article, remembering Keaton, via The Free Press; he referred to her, through his writing, as “unlike anyone the planet has had or is ever likely to see again.”

    Nancy Meyers, director of Baby Boom and Something’s Gotta Give, called Keaton “a force of authenticity.” “She taught generations of women that being yourself – truly yourself – is the most beautiful thing you can do,” Meyers stated.

    Francis Ford Coppola remembered her as “creativity personified,” while Keanu Reeves, her co-star in Something’s Gotta Give, called her “a generous artist and a uniquely special person.”

    Her First Wives Club co-stars Goldie Hawn and Bette Midler also shared their remembrances. “Diane was unafraid,” Hawn wrote on social media. “She took vulnerability and made it powerful, and in her awkwardness came the art form.”

    A Timeless Influence

    It would be an understatement to call Keaton solely an actress; the cultural impact cannot be ignored. Her Annie Hall wardrobe influenced women’s fashion for the 1970s, and her candid sense of humour and emotional intelligence redefined what it meant to be the female lead of a film.

    She won an Academy Award, two Golden Globes, and several lifetime achievement awards, but didn’t let her success go to her head. “I never thought I was glamorous,” she once told an interviewer in 2019, “I wanted to take the notion of glamour and be interesting.”

    Ultimately, Diane Keaton’s legacy cannot be divorced from the genuineness with which she approached her work. Whether she played a jittery lover, a frazzled mother, or any woman caught in a midlife moment of self-realisation, she would play the character with equal parts grace and resolve.

    Her memory will live on through her two sons, Dexter and Duke, as well as her works, which will always anchor contemporary film.

    Her very life, as funny, fearless, and, beyond belief, as it was, was a Diane Keaton production in every way.

  • McLaren Racing Crowned as the Constructors’ Champions of 2025

    McLaren Racing Crowned as the Constructors’ Champions of 2025

    In a remarkable show of its comeback, McLaren Racing has won the 2025 Formula 1 Constructors’ Championship. This is its second consecutive title and an important achievement that confirms the team’s return to the highest level of the sport.

    McLaren’s 2025 performance stood out for its consistency, speed, and teamwork. After the Singapore Grand Prix, the team had gathered a total of 650 points, which was double the amount of its closest competitor and enough to clinch the championship with six races to go, achieving 12 wins in 18 races and earning 28 podiums between the two drivers.

    McLaren’s 2025 machine, the MCL39, proved to be more than just an upgrade. Its aerodynamic efficiency, cooling systems, and suspension worked well on various circuits. By mid-season, the car often ranked as the fastest in many qualifying sessions and demonstrated race pace in different conditions. On the driver front, McLaren’s lineup of Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri became a strong duo. They delivered impressive finishes, secured wins, and frequently occupied the front row, contributing steadily to the constructors’ tally through both qualifying and race performance. Their consistent results allowed McLaren to build a lead that eventually became unassailable.

    Beyond the car and drivers, the McLaren team seemed unified at last. Every department, including design, factory, trackside engineering, and strategy, played a part. Their updates came at the right time, and their race strategies were flexible, minimising mistakes that could have cost them, and their decision-making under pressure improved.

    While this achievement is significant, McLaren knows that 2026 will bring major regulatory changes. The risk is that their current dominance may not carry over to the new rules. Managing the relationship between two top drivers is always tricky; when competition is tight, conflicts within the team become more likely. Keeping morale high, avoiding costly mistakes, and staying innovative will be crucial. Their focus shifts to the Driver’s Championship, with both Piastri and Norris the main contenders to take the crown, in what promises to be a close fight till the end of the season.

    In 2025, McLaren did more than just win. They overcame sceptics and moved past previous failures. They reestablished themselves not just as competitors but as leaders. The Constructors’ title is a reward for the drivers, engineers, and everyone in the pit lane and factory; this victory feels like a fresh start. Now, the question is whether they can build on this success to achieve even greater goals while adjusting to the upcoming changes in the sport.

  • Centre Court’s New Classic: A Tale of Fire and Ice

    Centre Court’s New Classic: A Tale of Fire and Ice

    Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier, Manchester United versus Liverpool, the Boston Celtics versus the Los Angeles Lakers, Lin Dan and Lee Chong Wei: Sport thrives on rivalries. Audiences become fans of an athlete’s skill, personality, and consistency, and through that connection find a greater thrill in the game itself. Rivalries bring these audiences together, turning their support into fuel for a sport’s growth. Throughout history, these contests have revolutionised sports, and tennis has been fortunate enough to host many.

    In men’s singles Tennis, multiple rivalries have defined eras, like Borg-McEnroe and Sampras-Agassi, but the most impactful of them all was between Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal. Federer was an elegant powerhouse famous for his effortless game and remarkable single-handed backhand, while Nadal was the “King of Clay”, owing to his high-spinning forehand and near-perfect record on clay. Along with Novak Djokovic, they ruled men’s tennis for nearly two decades. Yet, the Federer-Nadal pairing remained special, built on a foundation of mutual respect and genuine friendship. With Federer’s retirement in 2022 and Nadal’s farewell tour in 2024, the spot for the next big rivalry in tennis was open for contention, and two young stars have quickly taken over.

    First, meet Jannik Sinner. Born in San Candido, Italy, the 24-year-old rose to the top of the men’s standings, achieving the World Number One rank in 2024 after his first Grand Slam win at the Australian Open. Leaving his home at just fourteen to train full-time, he began his development under renowned coach Riccardo Piatti, a mentor to talents like Novak Djokovic and Richard Gasquet. Sinner announced his arrival on the ATP tour in 2019 by winning the Next Gen ATP Finals in Milan. The following year, at age 19, he became the youngest Italian in the Open Era to win an ATP title. Driven by early financial strains, he recently revealed that he had promised his parents he would quit tennis if he wasn’t in the top 200 by age 24. Today, with four Grand Slams and 21 ATP titles to his name, it is safe to say he has surpassed his own expectations.

    Next is Carlos Alcaraz, a 22-year-old Spaniard and the current World Number One. Characterised by his innate talent and aggressive playstyle, Alcaraz has a natural feel for the game. At fifteen, he began his journey under the guidance of fellow Spaniard and former world number one Juan Carlos Ferrero, turning pro a year later at sixteen. A true tennis prodigy, Alcaraz became the youngest male player in history to reach the No. 1 ranking at 19 years of age, following his first major win at the 2022 US Open. Since then, he has acquired five more majors along with 23 ATP titles, and with his young age, this is only the beginning.

    This year, Sinner and Alcaraz have duelled numerous times and their rivalry has electrified the sport. Their first meeting of the season was in the final of the Italian Open, Sinner’s first tournament after facing a three-month ban due to doping. At his home tournament, Sinner played a close match, but ultimately Alcaraz emerged victorious with a scoreline of 7-6(7-5), 6-1. But this was just a teaser for what was coming next.

    At the French Open, Sinner managed to set another final against Alcaraz, where the two made history by playing one of the most extraordinary matches of the decade. Alcaraz made a show-worthy comeback, saving three match points to beat Sinner 4-6, 6-7 (4), 6-4, 7-6 (3), 7-6 (10-2) in the longest French Open final ever at 5 hours and 30 minutes, winning his second consecutive Roland Garros title. Alcaraz also ended Sinner’s unbeaten record at Grand Slam finals, while he protected his own winning streak. The story continued at Wimbledon, the two meeting yet again in the final. Yet this time, Sinner turned the tables and handed Alcaraz, the two-time defending champion, his first loss at a major final 4-6, 6 4, 6-4, 6-4. It was Sinner’s second Slam of the year, winning the Australian Open earlier in January after defeating Alexander Zverev.

    The recent US Open was filled with the likes of Novak Djokovic, Ben Shelton, Taylor Fritz and Lorenzo Musetti providing much more competition, yet for the third consecutive time Sinner and Alcaraz faced off in a Major final. Alcaraz ended the Italian’s streak of 27 slam wins on hard courts to take the title, and in the process splitting the four grand slams between them for two straight years. Alcaraz also dethroned Sinner as the World Number One, ending his 65-week reign at the top.

    These matches are early signs of a brewing rivalry that has the potential to sustain itself for years to come. A year of 5 finals and counting, they have shown a remarkable hold over the ATP tour, nobody else being able to match them in Slams. While Sinner is the more calculated player, grinding down his opponents with immaculate defence and consistent baseline strokes, Alcaraz is extremely aggressive with a variable playstyle, incorporating drop shots and a great net presence into his arsenal. As Sinner himself alluded, Alcaraz brings the “firepower and hot shots,” while he provides the composure of a relentlessly solid player. What more could we ask for? Perhaps the dawn of the next Big rivalry in the sport.

  • High Seas Treaty to Come Into Effect After Crossing the Ratification Threshold

    High Seas Treaty to Come Into Effect After Crossing the Ratification Threshold

    On 19 September 2025, in a landmark development for ocean governance, the UN High Seas Treaty (BBNJ Agreement), secured the minimum 60 ratifications required for it to officially come into force by January 2026. With this achievement, the treaty is now on track to become legally binding, marking a major step forward in international environmental governance. Morocco became the 60th country to deposit its ratification instrument, triggering the 120-day countdown to the treaty’s entry into force. On the same day, Sierra Leone also deposited its ratification, becoming the 61st party to the agreement.

    Formal negotiations over the treaty began in 2018 and the draft was finalised in 2023. Previous discussions spanned across 20 years, driven by concerns over the unchecked exploitation of marine resources and the absence of a unified legal framework. The progress was slow due to differing national priorities over issues like resource sharing, fishing rights, and industrial activities in international waters.

    What this treaty aims to do
    The treaty was designed to tackle some of the most pressing threats to ocean health. One of these includes the creation of marine protected areas (MPAs), which are large stretches of international water designated to act as conservation zones. Human activities are strictly controlled, limiting activities such as fishing and breeding. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) will also be made mandatory. Any major activity proposed in the high seas, such as deep-sea mining or industrial fishing expansion, will need to undergo detailed assessments, and parties must also keep under surveillance the impacts of any activities in areas beyond natural jurisdiction which they authorised or engage in.

    The treaty also addresses the growing importance of marine genetic resources, which are products from marine organisms carrying hereditary information, such as genes, and have the potential to be used in medicine, food, cosmetics, etc. The resources can cause issues with sustainability and equal accessibility of resources. The agreement also prioritises capacity development and technology transfer. Developing nations do not have the financing and technology to engage fully in high seas management. The agreement thus contains commitments to offer training, capital, and access to new technologies, allowing all nations to contribute actively to the monitoring, conservation, and sustainable management of the seas.

    All of these measures aim to support the global “30×30” target, which is the commitment to conserve at least 30 percent of the world’s land and sea by 2030. Since the high seas make up nearly half of the planet’s surface, the treaty is considered essential for achieving this target and reversing the fast decline of global biodiversity.

    Global Reactions
    Many advocates have pointed out that this treaty is one of the strongest demonstrations of collective will to take action against climate change since the Paris Climate Agreement. For small island nations and coastal states, which are among the most vulnerable to the impacts of ocean degradation, the treaty is seen as a lifeline for both biodiversity and livelihoods.

    However, there exists the challenge of ensuring the treaty is applied effectively across all regions, particularly in waters where industrial fishing and resource extraction are lucrative.

    Looking Ahead
    While the treaty’s entry into force is a breakthrough, its success will depend heavily on implementation. Countries that have ratified it will need to translate commitments into national laws, strengthen monitoring of their fleets, and coordinate with existing regional and sectoral bodies. Financing, transparency, and enforcement will be constant challenges.

    Another crucial test will be participation. Some major maritime powers have not yet ratified the treaty, raising concerns about the consistency of enforcement across the high seas. Nonetheless, the agreement creates momentum and pressure for broader adoption in the years ahead.

  • H-1B Overhaul: White House Announces $100,000 Fee for New Applicants

    H-1B Overhaul: White House Announces $100,000 Fee for New Applicants

    On September 19, 2025, the White House announced in Washington, D.C. that all new H-1B visa applications will now carry a $100,000 fee – a move introduced through a presidential proclamation by President Donald Trump. This change, set to take effect on September 21, applies only to new petitions and has already sparked legal challenges, industry backlash, and urgent warnings from major tech firms.

    The new $100,000 fee will be charged on petitions received after September 21, 2025. Important to note, it will not get charged on:
    • Petitions filed prior to that date
    • Current H-1B visa holders
    • Extensions or renewals in valid H-1B status

    Authorising bodies such as USCIS, CBP, and the State Department acted hastily to make sure that the change would become effective prospectively only. Nevertheless, questions abound regarding specifics such as when and how the fee will become due upon filing, upon issuance of visas or upon arrival in the U.S.

    The Ripple Effect: How the $100K Fee Will Reshape Work and Innovation
    For large technology firms, $100,000 per new recruit is anything but small change. These fees would quickly mount up for companies that employ many H‑1B visa workers, much less so, including the other fee costs, as well as compliance expenditures. Startups, which live on thin margins, face an even tougher choice: employ offshore at a higher cost, or don’t hire.

    Proponents of the change believe the H‑1B system has been misused to crush wages as well as treat American workers unfairly. By introducing this high fee, the government hopes to prevent over-reliance on offshore labour and incentivise firms to focus on domestic hiring. Critics, on the other hand, view it as a political move rather than a pragmatic fix.
    America long drew some of the brightest minds on the planet. That pipeline is now critically disrupted. If firms hold back on sponsorship, high-skilled workers will instead look to Canada, Europe, or even Asia, where the cost of immigration is cheaper.

    The urgency of the change was underscored when major tech giants, including Amazon, Google, and Microsoft, urged their employees abroad to return to the U.S. quickly before restrictions tightened. The move reflects widespread concern over the possibility of more restrictive measures at ports of entry.
    On the legal front, California has already announced plans to sue, arguing that such sweeping measures fall within Congress’s authority, not the executive’s. Should the courts agree, the proclamation could be overturned or narrowed, though any resolution is likely months away.
    Another fundamental aspect is the “national interest exemption.” Some employees or industrial inputs deemed indispensable, like healthcare, national defence, or industries suffering shortages, could receive exceptions, although eligibility rules are not defined yet.

    Reactions Across the Board: Industry, States, and Advocacy Groups Speak Out
    The introduction of the $100,000 H‑1B fee evoked immediate and vehement reactions from all stakeholders. The technology sector, highly reliant on international talent, was apprehensive. Major corporations like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft cautioned that they would have to rethink hiring plans and reassess operations. Some will already ponder covering the cost for essential recruits, and others will reduce H‑1B sponsorship or even offshore projects in order to sidestep the cost.

    State governments, and particularly California, reacted to the fee directly as a threat to their economies. With Silicon Valley located in it and possessing a large concentration of high‑tech industries, California policymakers argued that the policy would strangle innovation and harm the competitiveness of the state. The state already signalled it would litigate the policy in court legally and made the question partly one not only of economics but also of constitutionality.

    Advocacy groups for immigrants reacted with concern, cautioning that it would deter highly skilled workers from coming at all. They contended that American leadership in technology, research, and healthcare relies upon luring international talent, and such a hefty fee would adversely affect them. Several advocacy groups also mentioned the larger human cost, referencing personal and professional dislocation it would create among employees who would move to the U.S., and U.S. lawmakers offered contradictory responses. A number of Republican and Democratic senators professed concern about protecting American jobs, while others urged America to stay ahead in scientific and technological competitiveness. Both lawmakers and corporations have already urged congressional examination of the proclamation, and some have encouraged corporations to reveal more about how they will change.

    In reality, the answer is one of shared recognition: this is not about changing immigration policy; it’s a decision whose consequences are profound for the American economy.

    Navigating the Unknown: Key Issues in the New H-1B Era
    The dust is far from settled on the $100,000 H‑1B fee, and countless questions are unanswered. One of the most immediate concerns is how it will work: will it be collected at the time of filing the petition, upon approval of the visa, or upon entering the United States?

    Another big unknown is how sweeping exemptions will be, although the proclamation allows for “national interest” exceptions, it is not at all clear what industries or professions will qualify. Will doctors, scientists, or teachers qualify for exemptions?

    Another unknown is how long the rule will last; although initially set to last for 12 months, extensions are likely and could prolong its impact. Finally, global ripple effects are unknown. India and China, nations that supply many H‑1B skilled workers, will likely alter migration plans, and American corporations will consider opening international branches to avoid hurdles altogether. These unanswered questions ensure that the coming months will loom large in determining what will become of the H‑1B program.

    A Balancing Act Between Protection and Progress
    There is public pressure to protect American workers, prevent wage suppression, and regulate H‑1B program abuses. On the other hand, America values maintaining its global innovation edge by attracting top talent from abroad.

    Experts warn that drastically reducing H‑1B employment could harm economic growth, especially in high-tech sectors facing shortages, and disrupt innovation pipelines affecting long-term competitiveness. Ironically, some companies might offshore more jobs, reducing opportunities for American workers and undermining the goal of protecting domestic employment.

    The coming months will reveal if this move manages to zero in on American workers or if it incidentally resculpts the global talent pool against America’s interests. If the charge remains as advertised, then we could witness a reduction in foreign-skilled recruitment, with corporations making strategic shifts to reduce expenses, possibly by offshifting operations or R&D. The breadth and use of exemptions will also have a determining influence on which industries will continue to avail themselves of global talent. There will also be legal suits, state resistance, and private sector lobbying that introduces additional variables to create something of an evolutionary tale. At bottom, H‑1B controversies aren’t about immigration policy itself; they’re about America’s future as an engine of innovation, about America’s role in the global economy, about how America balances defending domestic workers with keeping open doors to international excellence. Decisions will help chart that future for generations to come.

  • The Future of the Red Soles: Jaden Smith Joins Louboutin as Creative Director

    The Future of the Red Soles: Jaden Smith Joins Louboutin as Creative Director

    On September 17, 2025, Maison Christian Louboutin announced Jaden Smith as the first-ever Men’s Creative Director, marking a historic moment for the luxury brand known for its landmark red-lacquered soles. In addition to overseeing 4-yearly collections of men’s shoes, leather goods, and accessories, the position also involves handling general creative responsibilities like campaigns, immersive events, and brand experiences. Before making his debut with the Men’s Fall/Winter 2026 collection at Paris Men’s Fashion Week, Smith will move to Paris to take on the role and his first preview capsule is scheduled for January 2026.

    Why Louboutin Put His Faith in Jaden Smith

    Smith was the sole choice for the position, according to Christian Louboutin, because of his “rich and multidimensional” world, inspiring style, cultural sensibility, curiosity, and openness.

    According to Louboutin, he was searching for someone with “a unique perspective and cultural curiosity.” He added, “His world is rich and multidimensional, and he is able to move between music, fashion, and art in a way that feels natural.”

    The decision also has a statistical backing, as Louboutin confirmed that the men’s department, responsible for approximately 24% of the brand’s revenues, has been underperforming lately. “The men’s collection is important to us, but it needs a new voice. Jaden brings a younger energy and cultural flair that can help it thrive,” he said.

    Smith expressed excitement about the role in a conversation with Women’s Wear Daily- “This is a dream. I’ve always looked up to Christian, and to now be able to create under this house, with this history, is an honour. I want to push boundaries, but also respect the craftsmanship that makes Louboutin what it is.”

    Besides his fame as an actor and musician, Smith has a long relationship with fashion, as reflected in his unique personal style, partnerships with footwear companies like New Balance, and his own brand, MSFTSRep Infinity.

    Analysts like Business of Fashion and Forbes have commented that this move is part of a larger trend wherein legacy luxury fashion houses are gradually bringing in new voices, either to stay culturally relevant or as part of future succession planning. According to Louboutin himself, this appointment is more about acting on an existing presence that impressed him than it is about filling a void.

    The Backlash: “Nepotism or Necessary Disruption?”

    Numerous critiques have focused on the idea that it is Smith’s celebrity status and family name, rather than any background in design and fashion, that have earned him the position. Smith’s lack of formal fashion education or training has been brought up by numerous critics questioning his relevance for such a role. Numerous internet users are concerned about his ability to maintain the high standards of a luxury home with a rich history due to his lack of craftsmanship experience. Concerns have also been raised that the move may be motivated more by appearance than by merit.

    Fashion analysts have commented that this is a branding strategy aimed at mending the decline in menswear sales by leveraging Gen Z culture and celebrity involvement. While some argue it is a sensible business approach, others find that the move prioritises the appearance and face of the brand over craftsmanship, design and heritage.

    Fans Caught Between Excitement and Doubt

    The news sparked a variety of responses online. Supporters hailed Smith as a daring and unexpected selection who could inject youthful vigour into the brand. Conversely, critics questioned whether bringing him on board was an act of nepotism, especially considering that countless trained designers work their whole careers for such opportunities. Others highlighted his lack of a formal design education or technical training as a possible liability. Neutral commentators expressed intrigue yet withheld passing judgment until Smith’s first collection is presented in early 2026.

    Déjà vu in the Fashion World

    Jaden Smith’s appointment is not the first instance of a celebrity being an unconventional choice for such a high role in luxury fashion. In 2023, Pharrell Williams was named creative director of menswear at Louis Vuitton. His tenure has demonstrated how celebrity influence can diversify a legacy brand to connect with youth culture, despite initial scepticism regarding his relevance for the role.

    Prior to Pharrell’s appointment at Louis Vuitton, Virgil Abloh served as the Artistic Director for the brand’s menswear line. Despite initial backlash, Abloh went on to reimagine luxury fashion through his fusion of streetwear sensibility and high-end luxury fashion. In the early 2000s, the Olsen twins and Victoria Beckham also used their celebrity status to launch fashion brands that have since become renowned names in fashion. These patterns suggest that while fame can open doors in the fashion industry, sustained credibility depends on consistent quality and a clearly defined creative vision.

    While celebrities have a foot in the door due to their fame and status, true success in fashion has less to do with fame and more to do with the distinctive creative vision they bring to the table. For Jaden Smith, the real test will be whether he can move beyond his celebrity status and prove his validity for the role through the work he delivers at Louboutin.

    What is in Store for Louboutin’s Future

    Pharrell’s work with Louis Vuitton is a prominent example of how luxury fashion is becoming more at ease with leaders from different artistic backgrounds. Many young creatives now define themselves by a combination of culture, activism, music, performance, and fashion.

    Smith’s appointment could usher in a powerful new era, striking a balance between his unique Gen-Z aesthetic sensibility and honouring Louboutin’s design heritage. The first test of this will be the preview capsule in January 2026, and the market reaction will speak volumes. Will consumers and competitors view this appointment as genuine and significant, and can Smith bring in fresh innovation to the brand, or will his role be purely symbolic? Could he become another such unexpected force that influences the direction of fashion?

  • Russia Turns to AI for Breakthroughs in Oncology

    Russia Turns to AI for Breakthroughs in Oncology

    Once defined by its military aerospace strength, Russia is now channelling its scientific expertise into healthcare with artificial intelligence (AI) driving breakthroughs in diagnostics, drug discovery and personalised cancer treatment. By harnessing artificial intelligence, the country is making significant advancements in diagnostics, drug discovery, and personalised cancer treatment, positioning itself as a rising force in healthcare innovation.

    The global AI in medicine market is currently valued at $22 billion, with Russia’s share already at 12 billion rubles. Analysts predict explosive growth, forecasting the global market to reach $130-160 billion and the Russian market to hit 78 billion rubles by 2030. The explosive growth is an example of the successful embedding of the rapid integration of AI and medicine

    A prime example of successful implementation comes from Russian ophthalmology. The Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases is using AI to diagnose, monitor, and treat retinal diseases, a crucial innovation for an ageing population. Similarly, developing personalised vaccines for colorectal cancer is seen as a significant achievement in the medical field. Imagine an ophthalmologist in Moscow not just depending upon his own trained eye but adding an AI that can deduce the patient’s retina with superhuman precision. AI, when used as a significant tool in diagnosis, can do wonders once blended with the trained expert’s eyes.

    Russia has identified AI as a crucial area for Strategic Development. Institutes such as Skovo Institute of Science and Technology are working on developing AI in drug discovery and medical image analysis. AI is commonly used to analyse X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs. In Oncology, Russian researchers are developing personalised vaccines for colorectal cancer. AI models analyse tumour genetics, identify unique cancer antigens, nd design vaccines tailored to each immune system. This makes the treatment more individualised rather than following a generic treatment process with a one-size-fits-all approach.

    However, the implementation of AI in healthcare comes with risks, as mistakes can threaten the lives of patients. AI models can sometimes distort data or fail to understand context. Mitigating these risks requires rigorous testing and significant investment.

    The following 3-5 years are seen as decisive. For Russia to succeed, companies must develop a careful strategy that includes managing investor expectations, ensuring high-quality data to train AI models, and creating testing platforms to get feedback from doctors. Those who can bring clinically validated solutions to market first will set a new standard for medical care in Russia and beyond. However, no matter how real the potential is, the proof and science will only be considered after successful large-scale clinical trials. The world is looking for better solutions and medicines. The use of AI by superpowers in the medical field, rather than warfare, is definitely an effort that is being globally applauded.