With a grand opening ceremony held separately at three different venues, the FIFA World Cup began on 12 June. Except for not holding it twice, when the world was at war in 1942 and 1946, the mega sports extravaganza has been consistently held every four years since 1930, and is now in its 23rd edition.
The Indian sports enthusiast is viewed as a consumer of sports rather than being physically on the ground (India, ranked third in the world, has a considerable adult and children population that is classified as obese), and is now all geared up for FIFA26. From which OTT or subscription channels are live-telecasting the FIFA matches, to which matches to view and which players not to be missed, while in action, all these calculations were clearly mapped by the Indian television audience much in advance and even before the games kicked off.
Whenever football is discussed, it inevitably brings the game into question, in contrast to the most popular game in India, cricket. No one would disagree with this choice. Despite the spirit of shrugging off colonial baggage and the decolonisation of various spheres of knowledge and ways of life, the game of cricket, handed down to Indians by the colonisers, still seamlessly sneaks into conversations people wish to have at typical social gatherings.
With the addition of the glamour quotient from Bollywood, which is a strong allyship to the game (cricketers’ affairs/marriages with Bollywood cine idols) and, in some instances, partnerships in the ownership of IPL teams (Periti Zinta, Shah Rukh Khan, Juhi Chawla), as well as ownership of teams, has helped draw more viewers and spectators to the game.
Cricket is always regarded as a religion in India, and its demigods are followed by millions. Not long ago, the celebrations (victory parade) that culminated at the Chinnaswamy stadium left 11 people (RCB Fans) killed in a stampede. Just for argument’s sake, in India, is cricket and a cricketer worth dying for? This is altogether taking a different trajectory from the present argument. Though India has never played in FIFA, hopes are always high that cricket is one such game where both the men’s and women’s teams are sure to bring laurels.
The likes of Baichung Bhutia and Sunil Chhetri (called in after he retired from active participation) are among the very few men’s football players in the country whose names people usually drop. It would take some effort and would not immediately strike one’s mind to shout out a few more names. Though, for commercial interests, the Indian Super League (ISL) did generate some interest in Football amongst the TV viewers in India, it failed to be an economically viable proposition, muddled with bureaucratic hurdles. ISL failed to exist this year.
Which game has a longer historical past? The obvious answer is football. The modern game of football originated from the Chinese game of tsu chu (also known as cuju), which was played around 2500 BC. Tsu chu, which translates to ’kicking the leather ball with feet’, was part of physical instruction for troops during the Tsin Dynasty. The game has unquestionably grown to be the most popular, played, and watched game in the entire World, as it has spread to all corners of the globe over time. According to FIFA, more than 250 million people play Football across more than 200 Nations. Cricket is predominantly patronised by countries that were once British colonies. No wonder there is a strong lobby pushing to make cricket a permanent sports event at the Commonwealth Games.
When it comes to the nuances of both games, there are far too many rules that govern the game of cricket than football. Can anyone explain to someone without throwing them into a state of confusion about the DLS rule (Duckworth-Lewis-Stern) in cricket? The rule (which involves a lot of calculations) is applied when a game of cricket is interrupted by conditions not suitable for playing. Football, however, is considered an all-weather game with fewer rules compared to cricket. No disruption to the game from rain or slight snow. Moreover, the equipment for the game of cricket is far larger in comparison to football, where 22 people huddle in and play with a leather ball. The UN has a special mention of the game and its power for global peace and solidarity. May 25 is designated as World Football Day by the UN. Except for offside, Football is simple to understand, follow, and play.
Cricket continues to attract viewership irrespective of the formats. May it be 20-20, IPL, Legends (players from yesteryears), Women’s IPL, or the extended version of a 5-day test series. An average Indian, on any given day, can double up as an expert in the game. From choosing the playing eleven to the role of winning the toss and making the right choices. The well-informed audience is aware of the pitch condition 22 yards pitch. How overcast weather can actually help the seamers, and the dew that makes the ball grip difficult.
Most discussions, predominantly on football, frequently start and end with the goal scores of teams. Not much discussion thereafter is sustained. Unless a first-world nation and a few look out to watch for players in this World Cup edition, or the underdog team becomes part of social interactions.
An extended game (soccer as in America and Football for the rest of the dwellers on the planet) lasts at least 90 minutes. With no result from the designated time, an extra 30 minutes is granted, and even when the result is a draw, it would be decided by penalty shootouts. Despite all this, at times the final score may be read as a draw. The predictability of the match is difficult because if the ball is found inside the net, the game would have been in the last few minutes/seconds before the final whistle is blown three times) Indicating the game headed towards its conclusion. Well, in a typical 20-20, each ball seems to be far more exciting. Even a dot ball leads to the planting of trees.
Sport and Geopolitics
People who prefer following and commenting on geopolitics will be much more interested in watching Iran and the US face off on the pitch and in the field. Remember, during the Cold War, the Olympics were one of the battlefields to show superiority beyond military accomplishments and technological advancements. Sports, as one of the tools for the exhibition of soft power, may gather some traction in high-brow people’s gatherings. The ongoing war between the US and Iran (15 weeks since it began) is still dictating the world economy, grabbing headlines in the media, and competing for the Cup. With Iran and the US playing in different groups (Iran in G and the US in D), there is no immediate chance to play each other. However, the possibility may not be ruled out completely as the progress beyond the Group stage. Depending on the performances of both teams in the group stage and the various qualification permutations, an Iran–United States clash in the knockout rounds would not come as a surprise to either football fans or geopolitical observers.
This year will see a total of 6 women referees officiating in the FIFA tournament. Have we ever, by chance, witnessed women umpires in men’s cricket matches? Well, football has set the precedent of inclusivity in sports. The ever-encountering discourses in academia strongly speak about how to break away from Eurocentrism. Third-world nations, particularly Latin American countries, have so far won 10 FIFA World Cups. This is very close to the European countries’ tally of 13 wins. One can clearly place football as a sport that has come close to breaking away from Eurocentrism.
Fouls and rule-breaking are celebrated and fresh in the memories. The controversial ‘hand of gold’ (Maradona) statues are installed at various places. So is head-butted by Zidane. As a tribute to yesteryear football players who were legends in the game, roses were given their names. David Beckham is one of them. There are some streets and roadways named after football players for their contributions. Naming of food and drinks in celebration of a football player is not a new phenomenon. One of the primary sources of fashion is diffused through football. Inking of the body(tattoos), styling of the mane, wearing the wrong color shoes and socks.
Catching up about the highlights is another way to take part in those office conversations about last night’s game/games. This year’s tournament has a tri-nation fixture with the US, Canada, and Mexico hosting FIFA 2026. 48 teams from nations with populations as small as 5 lakh people (There are 46 cities in India with a population of 10 lakh and above) make the cut for the most-watched sport on the planet. Cabo Verde qualified for the present World Cup for the first time along with three more nations.
The question then pops up, which leads to what the youth of the country are doing and what the country is doing for sport. With over 350 million youth population, what has India’s contribution been in football? Does the game demand more endurance? Team camaraderie. A batsman or a bowler can decide the fate of the result in cricket. Football required more than a bit of anticipation, collaborative efforts expected from the playing 11. Can India, with its social hierarchies and favoritism exhibited on all fronts, be a good team? Well, the glories brought by hockey to the country stand as testimony to a team sport on display. What then is holding back football in India? Like all arguments and suggestions point out, at the end is the lack of proper infrastructure, nutrition, professionalism, and the incapacity of political offices and administration in encouraging and promoting sports culture. As a career, sports is always a second option. Gopichand, the all England badminton winner, cautioned the Indian middle class to keep their options open before choosing sports as a career.
The question of which nation will emerge as the best among the 48 competing teams will be answered in a month’s time. The experience is a sort of rarity, as the next edition will take place only in 2030. Till 19 July, happy owl-viewing for people who go by the IST.