Author: Nishtha Singhal

  • Everyone Watches Something Different. So, What Still Connects Us?

    Everyone Watches Something Different. So, What Still Connects Us?

    “Have you watched this?” was once a question that everyone knew how to answer.

    It might have been about a favourite TV series, blockbuster movie, or a cricket game, but the point is that people from millions of households watched the same thing at more or less the same time. They gathered around one TV set, talked about their favourite scenes with classmates the following day, and large cultural events became topics that everyone could discuss.

    Nowadays, however, everything has changed.

    Launch a Netflix account or an Instagram page with your friend. The chances are high that the two of you will find yourself watching something totally different – one person will have a feed full of K-pop videos, another one will be watching Formula 1 highlights, and the third one will spend the whole day watching anime or videos about cooking. Online streaming services and social networks personalise the content of every online session according to your preferences and interests.

    That is why many people think that a shared culture has gone extinct. But has it?

    The Age of Endless Choice

    Contrary to the television that existed in the early 2000s, nowadays’ audience has access to virtually endless entertainment opportunities through streaming, YouTube, and social media, offering the ability to watch millions of videos, listen to music, or watch movies without being tied to the schedule of television.

    Chris Anderson, in his 2004 article for Wired magazine, ‘The Long Tail,’ had anticipated such development when he claimed that people would be able to get rid of blockbuster movies and discover their niches due to online services that would not be limited by shelf capacity (Anderson, 2004).

    To some extent, Anderson was right about it.

    Today, people are willing to label themselves as K-pop fans, Formula 1 fans, anime fans, Swifties or gamers. It has become easy for people to find like-minded people in the online world thanks to online communities despite the place they live in.

    However, there is another story.

    Do We Really Watch Different Things?

    Despite an increase in the range of entertainment programs that people can access, audiences prefer watching a few extremely popular programs.

     

    As reported in Luminate’s 2025 Year-End Music Report, streaming music accounted for 253 million tracks at the end of 2025. However, nearly 120.5 million songs have been listened to ten or fewer times during the entire year, whereas only 29 songs achieved the level of one billion streams across the globe (Luminate, 2026).

     

    It means that although there is a lot of different content available today, only a few pieces become extremely popular.

    The same conclusion was made by Harvard Business School professor Anita Elberse, who argued that the era of blockbuster entertainment did not end and audiences are concentrated around a few extremely popular movies, songs, and TV shows (Elberse, 2008).

    Are Algorithms Really to Blame?

    One can easily come to the conclusion that the algorithms are building their own worlds. But research says this is only one of the reasons.

     

    A paper that was published in the journal Science examined how more than 10 million Facebook users consumed political news. Scientists discovered that even though there was an influence of the Facebook algorithm on what people consume, the influence of users themselves was much bigger (Bakshy, Messing & Adamic, 2015).

    It can be explained by the fact that algorithms always react to our interests and not invent new ones for us.

     

    It means that our feed is personalised, but it is not isolated from the general cultural trends; and these trends definitely do not disappear.

    No matter whether it is a World Cup football game, a movie or a meme on social media, there are some events that gather millions of people in one place at once.

    So, the claim that we live in an age without shared culture could be false.

    It seems like the culture just has changed its form.

    What Still Brings Us Together?

    If our everyday entertainment is becoming more personalised, what still creates shared experiences?

    The biggest answer is live events.

    There are certain events that need to be experienced live rather than watched afterwards. It could be the Cricket World Cup, an IPL final, or a large-scale music concert that people want to experience live. The live watching will also involve the social media conversations and interactions that will happen around it.

    One of the strongest examples of shared culture in India is cricket. As per the International Cricket Council (ICC), the India vs. England semi-final during the 2026 ICC Men’s T20 World Cup gathered 65.2 million live audiences on JioHotstar and created a world record for the highest-ever live digital sports viewing event globally (ICC, 2026).

    Similarly, blockbuster films continue to unite audiences despite the rise of streaming. Ormax Media’s India Box Office Report (H1 2026) found that the first half of 2026 recorded ₹6,398 crore in box office collections, the strongest performance since the pandemic. The report also showed that the top 15 films accounted for 58% of the total box office revenue, proving that audiences still gather around major releases (Ormax Media, 2026).

    These numbers show that while people have more entertainment choices than ever before, they still come together for cultural events that feel significant.

    Shared Culture Looks Different Today

    However, shared culture has not vanished; instead, it has become even more varied.

    In today’s world, a person can be a fan of K-pop, Formula 1 racing every weekend, enjoy watching anime, and at the same time feel happy about the Indian team’s victory in a cricket tournament. Nowadays, our interests are not confined to one type of entertainment only.

    Moreover, social media has changed how we take part in culture. Once upon a time, the audience could just watch. Today, however, it also creates. Memes, fan edits, movie reviews, theories, and discussions about them all are posted on the internet. Reels and audio files become part of the global discussion in several hours.

    For example, there is the Spotify Wrapped service. Each December, millions of users post their personalised summaries on the internet. Even though every summary is individual, the process itself becomes an online event where everyone compares their playlists and listening behaviour. According to the researchers Taylor Annabell and Nina Vindum Rasmussen, it becomes an “algorithmic event” (Annabell & Rasmussen, 2025).

    Therefore, personalisation does not necessarily separate people.

    So, Is Shared Culture Disappearing?

    Culture is constantly evolving rather than disappearing.

    It would seem that the problem here is not whether shared culture exists or not; the issue here is the accessibility of its current form.

    One cannot say that one type of culture exists for everybody. On the contrary, modern people are part of many different groups, and while their entertainment might be personalised, important experiences have the power to attract millions of viewers.

    In a world in which it seems like every person watches his/her own content, there is still connection among people. It does not happen due to the uniform consumption of entertainment but because people keep coming together for important moments in the same way as before.

     

    Image credits : Museu Valencià d’Etnologia, sala Secà i Muntanya, carro de televisions by Joanbanjo | Own work, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons

  • Who Gets to be Seen?

    Who Gets to be Seen?

    What does it mean to be recognised? At first the answer seems simple. It means feeling seen and valued. Today recognition means a lot more than just that. For communities recognition is about being visible and having a place in public life. It is about being able to preserve their history and assert their presence onto society. 

    In June 2026 some states in the United States led by Republicans started celebrating months. For example, Indiana and Tennessee said June is “Nuclear Family Month” while Arkansas and Utah said it is akin to “Fidelity Month”. The people who support these festivals say they are all about family, faith, commitment and traditional values. However LGBTQ+ advocates say that having these celebrations during Pride Month makes it harder for LGBTQ+ people to be seen.

    This is not just about what to call a month. It is about who gets to be part of life. The debate about Pride Month depicts the same. The people who support Nuclear Family Month and Fidelity Month say that values like family and faith should be recognised. Alternatively, the people who do not support them say that this is just a way to counter Pride Month and make LGBTQ+ people less visible. Consequently, this is not just about the month of June but about identities and values of people who associate them with that. Pride Month is about LGBTQ+ people. It is about equality and acceptance.

    To understand why Pride Month is important we need to take a look at its history. It started because of the Stonewall uprising in June 1969. This was the time when people at the Stonewall Inn, in New York City stood up against a police raid that targeted people of LGBTQ+ community. This event was a notable moment in the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement. The first Pride march happened this year and over time Pride Month became a staged event. Moreover, it was about celebration, remembrance and advocacy. Pride Month is a time when LGBTQ+ people are able to come together and celebrate their identities.

    This incident from history helps us comprehend the importance of visibility, and how LGBTQ+ people’s recognition is not about celebration but being acknowledged by the society and its people where they have often been treated unfairly over time. When people are not represented correctly they can feel alone and unseen. Research has shown that social support and visibility brings fulfillment. The Trevor Project found out that LGBTQ+ people who have support from family are less likely to attempt suicide. While visibility is not enough to fix all the problems, it makes sure that recognition helps in creating an environment where people can be supported and accepted.

    The other June observances caused reactions. LGBTQ+ advocates say that visibility shows whether politicians and institutions care about their communities or otherwise. Josh Coleman, the president of Central Alabama Pride says that LGBTQ+ people notice when politicians do not acknowledge their lives and histories. For the people who support Pride Month visibility is not just symbolic but it is a way to show that they are included in life. Recognition is about being part of life.

    The people who support such proclamations have views. Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders says that Fidelity Month is a chance to renew commitments to God, family, community and country. Indiana Governor Mike Braun states that the nuclear family is part of the society. From this perspective the observances recognise values that support stability and civic life. These values are of utmost importance to people.

    All these views show why recognition can be debatable. Public recognition is not about what is being honoured but about what societies choose to prioritise. When governments make proclamations they send signals about which histories, communities and values are essential key factors. This is why recognition can cause disagreements even when people are advocating for important things. Recognition does not have to be a competition. Some LGBTQ+ advocates express that values like family, faith and Pride are not mutually exclusive. LGBTQ+ people can value family and faith like anyone else. This means that identities and values can coexist together, rather than competing for recognition.

    In the end the debates about June 2026 show us something about culture. Recognition is not about naming a month or choosing one. It shapes visibility, belonging and experiences that are being acknowledged in life. The fight over Pride Month and alternative observances illustrates that recognition matters. It helps us determine who feels visible, valued and included in the story a society tells about itself. Pride Month and the alternatives observances are about values. These values do not have to be in opposition to each other. They can both be part of the story a society tells about itself.

     

    Image Credits: Wikimedia Commons