Blog

  • Who owns the street? Rising rebellion against tourism in the streets of Europe

    Who owns the street? Rising rebellion against tourism in the streets of Europe

    Across Europe this summer, locals have taken to the streets with a clear message: mass tourism is pushing them out of their cities. Residents are retaliating against rising rents, overrun public spaces, and a lifestyle that’s being sold for profit.

    Anti-tourism protests have occurred all summer across various European countries, including Spain, the Netherlands, and Italy. Thousands of protesters have taken to the city’s streets over the past few months to protest against mass tourism in Spain, especially in San Sebastián, which has the nation’s highest housing costs. There, protesters chanted slogans, one being, “Sustainable tourism is a mythological animal.”

    In June, Genoa residents staged a symbolic “noisy stroll” protest, dragging suitcases through the city centre to highlight the disruptive impact of mass tourism.

    Most recently, thousands of people protested on the Spanish island of Mallorca, with organisers arguing that the current tourism model exploits workers while benefiting only a small elite. Similar demonstrations have also taken place on other popular Spanish resort islands, such as Minorca and Ibiza. These islands, with a population of just over one million, hosted more than 15 million international tourists in 2024.

    On June 15, locals in Barcelona started spraying tourists with water and chanting, “tourists go back home.” Others also carried signs with slogans such as “Barcelona is not for sale” and “Tourism is stealing from us.”

    The ongoing demonstrations intend to shed light on the blatant “touristification” of European cities. The term refers to the emphasis and priority given to tourism rather than sustaining local life, amenities, and infrastructure. The protests aim to pressure governments to address the strain tourism has on rents and housing, and the collateral environmental damage caused. Many call for policy and urban planning that puts residents’ needs and livelihoods ahead of tourist demand. In cities like Venice, where fewer than 50,000 people live year-round, over 30 million tourists visit annually. As a result, much of the hospitality industry caters to the visitors rather than residents.

    A protester holds a sign reading “Tourism is killing Barcelona” during an anti-tourism demonstration in the city. / Photo: X / @UinHurricane

    Mass tourism has disrupted daily life across Europe, and one of the most pressing issues locals face is housing. Residential units have been scarce and are slowly being converted to tourist accommodations. This scarcity has also led to a significant hike in rent and housing prices. Reports conducted by Harvard International Review have indicated that there are now more tourist beds than residents in Venice. During protests in San Sebastián, a resort city on Spain’s northern coast, some residents stated that their leading cause of concern isn’t the act of tourism itself, but rather the “speculators and exploiters who use tourism as a facade to ultimately profit from the housing and overall lives of the residents.” Locals have also started advocating for more sustainable practices to protect natural resources, local infrastructure, and heritage sites. In 2023, a tourist was accused of damaging a statue in the city’s 16th-century Fountain of Neptune, located in the Piazza della Signoria. The same year, in another part of Italy, a group of tourists was accused of toppling a valuable statue at a villa.

    During the 2024 Olympics in Paris, a city with only 11.3 million residents, approximately 9.5 million individuals purchased tickets to attend the Games. In protest against the pollution of the Seine, which was expected to worsen with Olympic preparations, locals threatened to stage a mass defecation in the river, rallying under the hashtag #JeChieDansLaSeineLe23Juin (“I sh*t in the Seine on June 23”). The campaign, widely reported by outlets including CBS News and Forbes, was dubbed the “Paris Poop Protest” by Modern Diplomacy, which described how activists used a dedicated website and hashtag to coordinate their demonstration against both river pollution and government spending.

    Governments have gradually started responding to these persisting protests; cities like Barcelona have begun cracking down on illegal rentals and changing specific bus routes to protect elderly residents. Places like Santorini in Greece and Bruges in Belgium have started imposing taxes on their tourism and hospitality industries. Venetian officials recently declared the temporary entrance fee, implemented to control tourist crowds, a success. The new €5 (about $5.4) tourist charge, which began on April 25 and concluded on July 14, brought in more than €2.4 million (about $2.6 million).

    The summer of protest across Europe has made one thing clear: locals are no longer willing to stay silent as their cities transform into playgrounds for outsiders. While tourism remains a crucial economic engine, the cost of unchecked visitor influx, rising rents, environmental strain, and local life erosion has become too heavy to bear. As more residents push back, governments must reckon with a future in which tourism must be reimagined. Whether these measures can truly shift global travel culture remains to be seen.

  • From Allies to Adversaries? U.S. Slaps Highest Tariffs on India over Russia Energy Links

    From Allies to Adversaries? U.S. Slaps Highest Tariffs on India over Russia Energy Links

    On 6 August 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order that imposes an additional tariff of 25% on imports from India, effectively pushing the headline U.S. tariff on many Indian goods to 50% where the earlier reciprocal rate also applies.

    The implementation is not uniform, with the US administration signalling targeted applications. Some products appear to be exempted (for example, some smartphone and pharmaceutical shipments), but for labour-intensive categories where Indian exporters are concentrated- apparel, gems & jewellery, carpets and some food items- the tariff rate can become a threat very quickly, as buyers can likely shift suppliers.

    The order says the additional duty is being imposed because the U.S. government finds India is “directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil” and that the step is needed to address “an unusual and extraordinary threat” to U.S. national security. Unless India concedes in the next three weeks, the move will potentially hit its single largest export market, worth $87.3 billion annually.

    Indian Energy Security Meets America First

    Before the Ukraine war, Russian oil was barely 2% of India’s imports. However, by 2024, it had increased to 36%. In the first half of 2025, imports hit 1.75 million barrels daily. The rationale for India has been straightforward- cheap oil for a country of 1.4 billion is an economic necessity, not a geopolitical endorsement.

    Trump sees it differently. “India has always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and is Russia’s largest buyer of energy,” he wrote on social media. “They can take their dead economies down together.” It’s the second tariff hike, which has been framed as retaliation for India’s ‘funding’ of Moscow’s war machine.

    New Delhi has pushed back hard, accusing Washington of hypocrisy. The Ministry of External Affairs has pointed out that the EU’s trade with Russia last year- 67.5 billion euros in goods and 17.2 billion euros in services, far exceeded India’s. And the U.S. continues to tolerate large Russian energy purchases by China and Turkey without resorting to similar penalties. “Our imports are based on market factors and energy security needs,” the ministry said, calling the tariffs “unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable.”

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin about an upcoming visit did nothing to dismiss Trump’s idea of India as a Moscow enabler.

    Trump’s Real Obsession- The Trade Deficit

    For all the moral high ground Trump’s taking on Russia, many economists believe the real reason is the U.S.’s goods trade deficit with India. In 2024, as per a Reuters report, the gap widened to $45.8 billion, up 5.1% year-on-year. India’s exports to the U.S., led by pharmaceuticals, textiles, gems, and machinery, hit $87.3 billion, while U.S. exports to India lagged at $41.5 billion. May 2025 alone saw $8.83 billion worth of Indian goods heading to America.

    Trump has long viewed this imbalance as proof of Indian protectionism. His “reciprocal trade” doctrine demands zero-deficit commerce- a fantasy in the real world, but one he has applied indiscriminately, from Canada (35% tariffs) to Mexico (25%) and even close allies like the UK and Australia. The Russia issue, analysts argue, is a convenient pretext for a tariff tactic that forces India to buy more American oil, defence hardware, and agricultural goods.

    If the tariffs stick, U.S. consumers will inevitably pay more for everything from T-shirts to generic medicines. However, for Trump, the possibility of a narrowed deficit balances the domestic inflation risk.

    Economy and Market- Two Peas in a Pod  

    Citigroup warns of a 0.6% to 0.8% GDP hit for India if the tariffs endure; Morgan Stanley agrees on the upper bound. A more optimistic PHDCCI report estimates the damage to be just 0.19% of GDP, affecting less than 2% of exports. Either way, the pain will be sector-specific. Labour-intensive industries like textiles, gems, and pharmaceuticals will feel the brunt first. Supply chains may shift to Bangladesh or Vietnam, recreating what had happened when U.S.-China tariffs shifted manufacturing flows. The Reserve Bank of India has already intervened to limit rupee weakness.

    However, if Trump expected the Indian markets to report a major fall, the response has been underwhelming. The BSE Sensex closed at 79,857.79 on 8 August, down just 0.95%, with the Nifty 50 matching the fall. The losses marked a sixth straight week in the red- the longest such streak in five years, but why is panicking unnecessary?

    Foreign institutional investors pulled ₹15,950 crore from Indian equities in early August, but domestic institutional investors more than offset this with ₹29,070 crore in buys, supported by record systematic investment plan inflows. Mid- and small-cap stocks slipped more than 1% each, but the consensus among market strategists is that as long as domestic liquidity holds, i.e.,  the Indian consumers keep buying, India can sustain the tariffs at least in the short term.

    India’s Retaliation-  Damage Control, Negotiation, and Diversification

    India’s options are limited, with negotiation remaining a priority. WTO legal routes are available but slow. India could initiate consultations or panels, challenging U.S. national-security claims under GATT norms, similar to Brazil’s approach, though such resolutions take time and do less to prevent immediate impacts.

    Domestic measures include GST relief, credit support, and insurance for exporters, accelerating diversification via new FTAs with the Middle East, Africa, and the EU. Competitiveness improvements in key sectors are planned, but these address medium-term needs rather than short-term losses like order cancellations. Retaliation is seen as counterproductive, as it would increase Indian costs, expand the deficit from the U.S. perspective, and risk escalation.

    Competitors like Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Turkey may gain from U.S. orders. Indian firms with markets in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa stand a better chance, but this may not fully offset job losses in regions like Punjab or in textiles.

    What Does The Future Look Like for U.S.-India Relations

    Relations between the U.S. and India, initially prospering by shared interests against China, are under pressure. Trump’s recent engagement with Pakistan through deals on cryptocurrency, mining, and oil, alongside his claim of negotiating a May ceasefire (denied by India), has raised eyebrows in India.

    For the first time in two decades, U.S. relations have become a domestic political issue in India. In the U.S., with Trump’s influence, issues like immigration, deportations, H-1B visas (72% held by Indians), offshoring, and technology sharing could turn India into a partisan topic.

    Mistrust over third-party relations- such as India’s ties to Russia and U.S. dealings with China and Pakistan was previously managed. Tariffs on Russian oil, however, change this narrative. Trump’s comments, including calling India a ‘dead economy,’ have just added fuel to the tariff fire.

    A negotiated settlement in the near future could restore confidence, secure U.S. export gains, and keep strategic ties intact. Failure could see supply chains rerouted, investments delayed, and both economies paying the price for this unwarranted trade war. As former Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran puts it, India must “endure short-term pain to safeguard long-term sovereignty.” However, political scientist Pratap Bhanu Mehta is blunter, warning that Modi risks’ humiliation’ if he cannot manage a dignified off-ramp.

  • R.G. Kar victim’s parents continue relentless quest for justice as India celebrated Rakshabandhan

    R.G. Kar victim’s parents continue relentless quest for justice as India celebrated Rakshabandhan

    A year has passed since a doctor was raped and murdered in R.G. Kar nursing home in West Bengal, Kolkata. As the whole country celebrated ‘Rakshabandhan’ on the very same day the incident happened a year ago, the victim’s parents are still visiting the State and Central Govt. turn by turn in search of justice.

    Just a year prior, the horrific incident shook the whole nation; people around the globe took to the streets, raising systemic issues on women’s safety in the city of Kolkata. Fast forward to 2025, the victim’s parents are not satisfied, alleging “incomplete investigation”. According to the law, one person cannot commit this heinous crime. A civic volunteer named Sanjay Roy was convicted by the Sealdah Court and sentenced to life imprisonment till death. The judge excused the Death penalty because it was not a “rarest-of-rare” case, sparking huge controversy. On Saturday, 9 August, the victim’s parents called for a protest march in memory of their daughter. They alleged that they were stopped and beaten by the police near Park Street when they were marching towards the Bengal Secretariat. According to the victim’s father, they were stopped despite having court permission for the rally. Following their meeting with the Union Home Minister Amit Shah and CBI Director Praveen Sood over the incompetence of the West Bengal Government in giving them justice.

    Even after the R.G. Kar case, the crimes against women didn’t decline. A TMC student leader in the Union room of South Calcutta Law College raped a college student. In Pune, a girl was raped in her own house by a man pretending to be a delivery agent.

    As brothers vowed to protect sisters on the very same day, in a difference of a year, the victim’s mother was quoted by PTI saying, “Why are they stopping us? We only want to reach the secretariat and seek justice for my daughter.”  Thousands of women are molested and cat-called every day in India, and out of the many or two cases take the shape of R.G. Kar or Nirbhaya. As Durga Puja approaches in Bengal with Pandals fighting to make a women-related theme, the question arises, “What’s the need of worshipping a female deity when rape victims’ parents are lathi-charged by police for seeking justice?”

  • A Night of Firsts and Films with Heart: Highlights from the 71st National Film Awards

    A Night of Firsts and Films with Heart: Highlights from the 71st National Film Awards

    The 71st National Film Awards, announced on August 1, 2025, brought a wave of emotion, celebration, and overdue recognition across the Indian film industry. The ceremony, which honours the best of Indian cinema, stood out for its diverse selection of winners, ranging from regional gems to box-office blockbusters and deeply personal performances.

    As the sector navigates new obstacles, such as shifting audience preferences and digital disruption, this year’s National Awards confirmed that Indian cinema is not only surviving but also growing, daring, and flourishing.

    Historical win for Shah Rukh Khan 

    With more than 30 years in the industry, Shah Rukh Khan won his very first National Award for his commanding double role in Atlee’s ‘Jawan’. His performance as both a moral crusader and his army-man father was a crowd-pleaser and critical hit, underlining socio-political issues under the action-oriented image.

    In a tearful Instagram video, SRK thanked the jury, his team, and fans for Jawan’s win, saying, “I’m genuinely humbled”. With a visibly obvious injury, he went on to say affectionately, “Sending you half a hug, the other half will come soon.” The fraternity welcomed him to the winner’s circle- Kajol, Farah Khan, A.R. Rahman, and Anil Kapoor all sent him their congratulations.

    Rani Mukherji’s Fierce Comeback 

    Veteran actress Rani Mukerji won Best Actress for Mrs. Chatterjee vs Norway, where she played a Bengali mother who fights a foreign government to gain custody of her children. Based on real-life events, her performance was raw, intense, and emotionally crushing.
    “This is validation for my 30-year journey,” she said in a statement. Her cousin Kajol congratulated her alongside SRK, making it a proud moment for the Mukerji family.

    Vikrant Massey: From Underdog to National Icon

    The Best Actor award was won jointly by Vikrant Massey, who gave a soulful performance in 12th Fail, playing Manoj Kumar Sharma, a real UPSC aspirant with a humble background. The film, directed by Vidhu Vinod Chopra, brought to the screen the grit, vulnerability, and unassuming heroism of students fighting all odds to reach their destination.

    “Getting this honour alongside Shah Rukh sir is a dream,” Massey said. “I dedicate this to every student and underdog who felt unseen.”

    12th Fail Wins Best Film

    The most poignant of the wins at the 71st National Film Awards was, perhaps, Vidhu Vinod Chopra’s 12th Fail, taking home the highest honours for Best Feature Film- a victory for filmmaking that celebrates perseverance over privilege.

    Inspired by the tale of Manoj Kumar Sharma, a boy from a Chambal village who overcomes the daunting challenges to become a successful IPS officer, 12th Fail is a gritty and realistic portrayal of ambition overcoming adversity. Staying true to Anurag Pathak’s bestseller of the same name, the film avoids glorifying adversity, but instead presents it with a sense of weight and mounting sympathy, and offers a very human story of determination and hope.

    Director Vidhu Vinod Chopra, whose body of films includes Munna Bhai MBBS and 3 Idiots, called this project “the most important film” of his life. Chopra said, during his acceptance speech, “This film is not just Manoj’s story, it’s the story of every young Indian who’s been told that where they come from defines how far they can go. This award belongs to them.”

    12th Fail did not bank on melodrama. Rather, it used close-up storytelling, mundane settings, and real performances to craft a movie that was intensely personal and very national. It struck a chord with people of all ages and backgrounds.

    Popular Cinema Still Matters 

    Rocky Aur Rani Ki Prem Kahaani, a lively family drama directed by Karan Johar, won the Best Popular Film Providing Wholesome Entertainment award. This category frequently connects the gap between critical acclaim and widespread appeal. The victory confirmed that, when done well, high-budget Bollywood films continue to have a strong cultural impact.

    The film was a contemporary retelling of the classic Bollywood family saga and marked Johar’s return to directing after seven years. Rocky Aur Rani followed the unusual romance between a loud, expressive Punjabi man (Ranveer Singh) and an intelligent, independent Bengali journalist (Alia Bhatt) with flamboyant sets, humorous dialogue, and a progressive social message. Generations of people were won over by their chemistry, comedic timing, and emotional depth.
    Besides its Best Popular Film win, the film also took home the Best Choreography prize for Vaibhavi Merchant’s vivacious and stunningly filmed Garba song, “Dhindora Baje Re.” The song, which was widely praised for fusing traditional dance with modern storytelling, became a festival favourite.

    Powerful Performances in Supporting Roles 

    Regional cinema stole the limelight at the 71st National Film Awards, as outstanding performances finally found the national recognition they deserved. In the Best Supporting Actor award, the honour was shared by M. Bhaskar for Parking (Tamil) and Vijayaraghavan for Pookalam (Malayalam). Bhaskar’s performance as a common middle-class man embroiled in an increasingly hot war for a parking space; his performance, replete with pride, frustration, and an urgent need to assert dignity in a world where the common is overlooked, was phenomenal. Vijayaraghavan, a seasoned Malayalam actor, brought quiet weight to his performance in Pookalam, playing a centenarian grappling with hidden secrets and family pressures. Both actors brought nuanced performances of men whose flaws and vulnerabilities made them human.

    In Best Supporting Actress, the focus was on two equally riveting performances. Urvashi, known for her range in South Indian films, took home the award for Ullozhukku (Malayalam), where she tapped into the emotional pain of a woman grappling with generational conflict and unspoken sorrow in a Kerala family torn apart by flooding. Her acting was a masterclass in restraint and emotional subtlety. Janki Bodiwala, making her debut in the Gujarati film Vash, infused the national scene with new energy by acting as a young girl caught up in a supernatural thriller. Her acting was earthy and unputdownable, walking the line between innocence and fear in a performance that stayed with viewers.

    Regional Cinema Triumphs

    The accolades also showcased the depth of regional storytelling in India:

    1. The Best Hindi Film was Kathal: A Jackfruit Mystery – a scathing satirical take on police bureaucracy, starring Sanya Malhotra as a young inspector looking for missing jackfruits in a politician’s garden.
    2. Best Tamil Film: Parking – an engrossing drama of urban frustration and class conflict, featuring Harish Kalyan and M. Bhaskar as bitter neighbours.
    3. Best Marathi Film: Shyamchi Aai – a moving narrative of Sane Guruji’s life, documenting the relationship between a boy and his selfless mother.
    4. Best Gujarati Film: Vash – a horror thriller film featuring Hiten Kumar and Janki Bodiwala, where a family is haunted by supernatural forces.
    5. Best Malayalam Film: Ullozhukku – a sentimental family drama starring Urvashi, shot against the Kerala flood backdrop, where past secrets are exposed.
    6. Best Bengali Film: Deep Fridge – a critically engaging film on isolation and emotional loneliness in the era of the internet.
    7. Best Assamese Film: Rongatapu 1982 – a historical representation of ethnic strife in Assam, during a politically volatile time.
    8. Best Telugu Film: Bhagavanth Kesari – an action mass blockbuster film featuring Nandamuri Balakrishna, with mass appeal and a social message.

    Special Mentions and Technical Awards

    Vicky Kaushal’s commanding performance as Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw in Sam Bahadur earned the Best Film on National Integration, as well as Make-up and Costume Design honours. Calling it “a proud day for all of us at RSVP Films,” Kaushal was thrilled.

    Kerala Story also made waves, with Prasanthanu Mohapatra taking home Best Cinematography and Sudipto Sen taking home the Best Direction.

    Animal took home a Special Mention for re-recording mixer M.R. Rajakrishnan, along with the Best Sound Design and Best Background Score by Harshavardhan Rameshwar. Hanu-Man, meanwhile, took home Best AVGC Film for redefining the Indian superhero narrative.

    Conclusion 

    The 71st National Film Awards served as a window into the changing landscape of Indian cinema, not merely a list of winners. From the flamboyant celebration of Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani to the grassroots realism of 12th Fail, this year’s honours demonstrated a unique harmony between substance and spectacle.

    A powerful message is conveyed by the popularity of movies in a variety of languages, genres, and platforms: compelling narratives, no matter how big or small, will always find a following. The awards honoured not only cinematic brilliance but also the fearlessness to convey meaningful tales in an increasingly changing cultural terrain, honouring performances that were steeped in emotional depth, inner insight, and mass appeal.

  • India, US Unite in Space: NISAR Launch Marks Climate Tech Breakthrough

    India, US Unite in Space: NISAR Launch Marks Climate Tech Breakthrough

    On 30 July 2025, the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) satellite was successfully launched from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre at Sriharikota in Andhra Pradesh. This satellite is the first of its kind, designed to enhance global monitoring of climate change and natural disasters and boost overall environmental research. The Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV)-F16 rocket carrying the earth observation satellite lifted off from the second launch pad of the space centre at 5.40 p.m. IST. Eighteen minutes later, it injected the satellite into a sun-synchronous orbit.

    The NISAR had been developed for over a decade and costs 1.5 billion dollars, making it one of the most expensive Earth-observing satellites to date. The NISAR programme is a landmark moment in global space diplomacy, facilitating the collaboration between NASA’s cutting-edge technology and India’s engineering expertise. Indian space industry representative Anil Prakash, Director General at SatCom Industry Association (SIA-India), hailed the NISAR mission and Indo-US space collaboration.

    “With a legacy of over 400 international satellite launches, ISRO has emerged not just as a collaborator, but as a co-architect of next-generation Earth science missions,” he said.

    NISAR marks the most advanced collaboration between NASA and ISRO, underscoring the growing trust and interdependence between the two global space powers. Furthermore, India’s emphasis on peaceful applications of its space technology for climate resilience, disaster prediction, agriculture, and water management reinforces its commitment to sustainable development over space militarisation.

    Image Source: X/ @isro

    NISAR is the first satellite to observe the Earth using a dual-frequency Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). This satellite will scan the entire globe twice every 12 days. This collaboration encapsulates NASA’s L-band and ISRO’s S-band radar systems — the L-band uses higher wavelength microwaves to cover vegetation, ice and sand, while the S-band captures crop fields and water bodies.

    “NISAR can detect even small changes on the Earth’s surface, such as ground deformation, ice sheet movement, and vegetation dynamics. Further applications include sea ice classification, ship detection, shoreline monitoring, storm characterisation, changes in soil moisture, mapping and monitoring of surface water resources, and disaster response,” ISRO has stated.

    By combining advanced radar imaging with climate and environmental monitoring, the mission demonstrates the power of international collaboration to drive practical and long-term solutions to global challenges, from climate change and natural disasters to resource management. This launch is not just a significant milestone in science but also a commitment to advancing space diplomacy through collaboration and impactful scientific progress.

  • TCS Layoffs: A Wake-Up Call for India’s IT Workforce

    TCS Layoffs: A Wake-Up Call for India’s IT Workforce

    India’s economy has a longstanding history intertwined with the IT Sector, which is its most resilient pillar. However, recent news in late July of 2025 has sent shivers down the spine of the national workforce and brought up questions that are fundamental in determining the future of white-collared job opportunities. Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) has wielded an axe on its number of employees, deducting almost 12,000 workers. That is nearly 2% of its global workforce of 613,000 as of June 2025. It is a historical downsizing strategy in the 50-year journey of TCS legacy; the air now stands heavy within the sector that was once unshakable.

    TCS has been globally recognised as India’s largest IT services exporter and a key employer of India’s skilled middle class. Reports of such heavy layoffs force debates and conflicting arguments related to the ever-evolving workspace, adorned by limits of cost optimisation, the ethical implications of automation, and global restructuring. Although the exact number has not been officially confirmed by TCS, internal sources have cited an affected group of mid-to-senior-level professionals with 8-15 years of experience: mainly those who were a significant part of India’s IT success story. The redaction is a collective reasoning of performance reviews, shifting global priorities, and a broader move toward AI and cloud automation. But the question persists: is dumbing the workforce down to just operational strategy the quick and easy solution to mobility? Or is it an intentional shift caused by a cultural and structural shift in the way Indian IT giants perceive talent, efficiency, and global competitiveness?

    So what has the CEO said? K. Krithivasan has mentioned the layoff as an offshoot of “skills mismatch” and not the preconceived notion of AI delivering 20% productivity gains. Certain roles have now outgrown their traditional operative measures and no longer fit into the strata of next-gen technological progress. TCS has also allegedly been an investor in upskilling over half a million employees in AI and emerging tech. However, it was admitted that deployment may not be feasible for all, leading to the necessity of downsizing.

    Such a move also has the complete potential of reflecting a broader range of oncoming pressures: global economic uncertainty, slowdown in North American client spend, and increasing demand from clients for cost-efficiency and innovation-driven delivery models. However, analysts have also estimated the cut to cause a reduction in the overall employee costs by approximately 4% and add up to nearly 12% to TCS’s net profit recorded in the fiscal year that ended in March 2025.

    TCS has also brought in make-or-break alterations within the workforce that force “bench resources”- those employees who have been inactive for a long while to find a project within 35 days to secure their position, similar to longer grace periods provided previously. Alongside this, the employees who have been laid off will be receiving a period of compensation, severance packages aligning with industry standards, extended insurance benefits, and outplacement support. TCS has publicly stated that steps have been taken to ensure unaffected service delivery to clients, as well as providing counselling and career transition assistance during this period.

    A wider portion of the worksphere reconstruction is the cost reduction initiative at TCS, which comprises a freeze on lateral hiring of experienced personnel, temporary global suspension of salary increases, and tightened performance management of employees with bench or non-billable roles. The actions have been justified publicly as critical measures to help TCS remain agile and competitive in a business landscape where deal cycles are getting shorter, automation is on the rise, clients are exerting cost pressures, and global competition is intensifying.

    The announcement has stirred up considerable debate in the tech space and among Indian labour organisations. Employee rights activists and trade unions have raised alarm over both the quantum of the layoff and the safety nets available to re-employment for older staff who might experience re-employment to be more difficult on account of age or skills that are out of date. Some government officials and representatives for labour have pressed for further regulatory supervision and proactive measures to safeguard workers’ welfare, especially in an industry that has historically been considered a bastion of secure middle-class jobs.

    For the broader IT sector as a whole, TCS’s decision is being seen as both a symptom of and an influence on sectoral distress. Most large Indian IT companies, such as Infosys, Wipro, and HCL Technologies, are also under pressure to reshape their workforces to keep up with fast-evolving digital client needs. The development of generative AI, cloud-based designs, and sophisticated cybersecurity is making some jobs obsolete while opening up demand for new, highly specialised technical skills.

    For TCS, the decision marks the reversal of decades of a relatively placid model of employment, one of mass hiring, long tenures, and step-by-step upskilling. The company’s move marks the beginning of a new phase where speed, quick acquisition of skills, and constant learning become the need of the hour – to survive, not just for business but also for IT professionals. The change underscores the two-edged sword of technological advancement: while it opens new opportunities, it also shatters traditional career streams and security for thousands.

    The TCS layoffs are a critical inflexion point – not just for the company but for the Indian IT industry. They are a wake-up call that highlights the imperative for companies and professionals alike to adopt new competencies, become resilient to technological change, and develop more agility in responding to market and technological change. As India’s IT titans navigate the turmoil of a digital age, the following year will challenge the resilience and adaptability of both people and organisations.

  • Russia’s Kamchatka Hit by 8.8 Magnitude Earthquake; Pacific Nations on Tsunami Alert

    Russia’s Kamchatka Hit by 8.8 Magnitude Earthquake; Pacific Nations on Tsunami Alert

    The United States Geological Survey (USGS) stated that the quake was at 23:24 UTC (05:54 IST, 30 July), some 119 km southeast of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, an urban municipality in Kamchatka Krai. The earthquake was of relatively shallow depth of 19 kilometres, which maximises its capability to cause surface effects.

    The quake struck near Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, close to a volatile underwater fault line where tectonic plates constantly battle for dominance — the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench, infamous for past megaquakes.

    The ground trembled. Sirens cried out. Millions rushed to the top. A strong 8.8-magnitude earthquake off the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia late 29 July sent shockwaves across the Pacific Rim and prompted widespread tsunami warnings from Chile to Japan. The quake, which was one of the most powerful in more than ten years, triggered a worldwide series of evacuations, emergency responses, and a tense wait for impact.

    Epicentre and Geological Details 

    The United States Geological Survey (USGS) stated that the quake was at 23:24 UTC (05:54 IST, 30 July), some 119 km southeast of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, an urban municipality in Kamchatka Krai. The earthquake was of relatively shallow depth of 19 kilometres, which maximises its capability to cause surface effects.

    The quake struck near Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, close to a volatile underwater fault line where tectonic plates constantly battle for dominance — the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench, infamous for past megaquakes.

    Tsunami Warnings and Evacuations

    In less than ten minutes, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre (PTWC) came online and sent out warnings for countries in the Pacific, including French Polynesia, Japan, Chile, Hawaii, California, Alaska, Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia. Among the coordinated responses were that  Japan evacuated almost 2 million people from coastal prefectures; one person died due to the evacuation efforts. In the coastal areas of Chile, the evacuation involved more than a million people due to “red alerts”.   Hawaii declared an emergency, closed ports, rerouted traffic, activated statewide sirens, and opened public shelters.

    Western U.S. states, ranging from California to British Columbia, issued tsunami advisories; Crescent City in Northern California issued a warning about potential wave amplification due to underwater topology, despite the fact that actual wave heights were recorded at just over 1 foot (~0.3 m).

    By 31 July, the majority of regions had reduced or revoked warnings; Chile remained on alert, New Zealand kept coastal areas off-limits, and other countries adopted cautious advisory stances.

    The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) attributed the quick, synchronised response of the governments and the emergency services to “effective early warning systems and evacuation protocols.”

    Initial Impact and Damage Reports 

    Even though the earthquake was very powerful, no fatalities have yet been reported as of August 3. Russian officials in the Far East reported minor injuries, minor damage to buildings and power supply disruption in certain areas. Kamchatka Krai and portions of Sakhalin Oblast are yet to be physically inspected.

    Russian rescue forces were sent during the night, and the local authorities declared a state of heightened alert. However, the isolation of the epicentral region most likely limited casualties.

    Nuclear and Military Facility Concerns

    What rattled beneath the surface may have shaken more than just the earth. Some of Russia’s most classified military facilities, including naval bases thought to contain nuclear submarines, were dangerously close to the epicentre. As international intelligence services step up satellite surveillance in search of any indication of structural damage or compromised security, the Russian Defence Ministry’s silence has only stoked rumours. The earthquake has caused anxiety well beyond seismic circles in an area already shrouded in military secrecy.

    Global Seismic Significance

    The July 29 earthquake ranks as the world’s second most powerful earthquake after Japan’s 2011 Tōhoku earthquake, which had a magnitude of 9.1 and caused a devastating tsunami. It is currently the sixth most powerful earthquake to be registered by seismographs since the year 1900.
    Seismologists believe this movement is possibly part of a broader Pacific Ring of Fire tectonic process that will continue to have aftershocks for weeks.

    International seismic safety protocols are receiving more attention as a result of this incident. Budget cuts are a concern; experts stress maintaining and increasing funding for organisations like PTWC, which are essential to early warning effectiveness. There is growing support for regular simulation drills, public education campaigns, and better coordination among national meteorological, defence, and disaster management agencies, especially in areas vulnerable to megathrust earthquakes. Talks have started about extending reliable early-warning systems into under-monitored regions, particularly the Atlantic Ocean basin and Indian Ocean zones, beyond current networks.

    Although the Kamchatka earthquake did not cause significant damage relative to its strength, specialists highlight that it serves to highlight the ongoing seismic danger for countries along the Pacific. Authorities are reminding people who are in risk areas to be aware of safety protocols, especially since aftershocks and secondary risks can still materialise

  • Divya Deshmukh Creates History: Crowned Champion at 2025 FIDE Women’s World Cup

    Divya Deshmukh Creates History: Crowned Champion at 2025 FIDE Women’s World Cup

    19-year-old Divya Deshmukh from Nagpur made history by winning the final of the 2025 FIDE Women’s World Cup held in Batumi, Georgia. In a ‘passing of the torch’ moment, Divya defeated fellow Indian Koneru Humpy, who had become India’s first female Grandmaster in 2002. With this victory, Divya became the 88th Grandmaster from India and only the fourth Indian woman to earn this prestigious title. She secured victory with a 1.5-0.5 score in the tiebreakers.

    After two draws in the classic games, the match went to tiebreaks.  In the first game, Divya played with the white pieces and created several chances to win, but was unable to convert her advantage. Despite Humpy’s mistakes, the 19-year-old could not capitalise on the opportunities and the game ended in a draw. After the first tiebreaker, Divya told the official broadcaster of FIDE that the previous game did not go her way, and that she got into a “mess for no reason.”

    However, she bounced back in the second game, defeating 38-year-old Koneru Humpy, the reigning World Rapid Chess Champion and current World No. 5, to become the first Indian woman to win the World Cup. Both finalists have qualified for the upcoming 2026 FIDE Women’s Candidates Tournament, a crucial step towards competing for the World Chess Championship. Entering the tournament as the 15th seed, Divya outplayed several stronger, higher-ranked opponents on her way to the title, displaying exceptional tactical skill and determination.

    Divya’s mother, a doctor, stood by her side during her moment of glorious victory. Overcome with emotion, the two exchanged a heartfelt hug. “It’s hard for me to speak right now. It definitely means a lot, but of course, there’s a lot more to achieve,” said Divya. “I’m hoping this is just the start.” She stated that she believed her win was fate because, before the tournament, she had not even achieved a GM norm, let alone her victory in the FIDE Women’s World Cup.

    Divya Deshmukh celebrating her win with her mother.  Photo: X/@FIDE_chess

    A GM norm is earned by delivering a high-level performance in a FIDE-rated tournament; typically over nine games against strong, international opponents, including at least 3 Grandmasters. Divya’s rating also did not meet the required rating (a standard 2600) to be eligible for the coveted title. Yet, by winning this prestigious event, she bypassed all the usual FIDE requirements, thus emerging as the 44th female Grandmaster in the world. Prior to this, Divya has won several gold medals across major international events, including the World Youth Championship, Asian Championship, and World Junior Championships.

    Divya’s victory marks a historic milestone in Indian chess and has been widely celebrated, including by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who tweeted: “It’s been a phenomenal day for Indian Chess! Divya Deshmukh has not only won the 2025 FIDE Women’s World Cup but also become a Grandmaster. Congratulations to her. Her accomplishment will motivate many people and contribute to chess becoming even more popular among the youth.” Nitin Gadkari, the Union Minister of Road Transport and Highways, also congratulated her, stating, “This is a moment of joy and pride not only for Nagpur and Maharashtra, but also for the entire country.” Divya will now set her sights on the upcoming Grand Swiss tournament in Uzbekistan this September.

  • Is ‘F1 – The Movie’ Hollywood’s Victorious Return to the World of Racing Movies?

    Is ‘F1 – The Movie’ Hollywood’s Victorious Return to the World of Racing Movies?

    ‘F1: The Movie’ follows Sonny Hayes (Brad Pitt), an ex-F1 driver who retired from the sport after a career-ending injury and now races in any series he can, in any car he can, chasing the need for speed. Hayes is brought back to Formula One at the request of Apex GP team owner, Ruben Cervantes (Javier Bardem), who used to be his teammate during his first stint in F1. Hayes is set to drive along with Apex GP’s rookie driver, Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris).

    From the get-go, it’s made very evident that Hayes is a one-man team and he only listens to one man: himself, and that he is not above putting himself or others in harm’s way if it gets him that win. We see this perception challenged over the course of the film as Hayes bonds with the Apex GP team, but despite his best efforts, the team struggles to stay afloat.

    The Good…
    The film does an incredible job of immersing you in the world of racing. During a scene in the third act of the film, Hayes describes the perfect moment of being in the car, one where he feels like he’s flying. You see this feeling play out during the last race of the season, and you truly understand exactly what he was talking about.

    Claudio Miranda, the Director of Photography for this film, took the work he and Joseph Kosinski did during Top Gun: Maverick and built on it further. Miranda and Kosinski have worked together multiple times, and Miranda describes their relationship as one where they love to overcome new challenges. With Top Gun: Maverick, that was fitting six cameras into the cockpit of a fighter jet, and with F1, their enemy was weight. To tackle this problem, they fit a Sony FX3 sensor (a very accessible camera) into a camera body, and Panavision built custom remote heads that could be rigged onto the cars, which give us the iconic whip pans during the racing sequences of this film.

    … the Bad…
    Fans of the sport did receive more than enough warnings from the internet and early reviews to leave the technical brain behind and just enjoy the film for what it is: entertainment. Unfortunately, there were quite a few moments when the suspension of disbelief was thrown entirely out the window. Whether it be as tiny as the F1 race calendar being jumbled around or as large as the Apex GP team dealing with car damage fairly often, as a team on the verge of bankruptcy and liquidation, these errors start to pile on. These details are supposed to act like easter eggs and hype up any fans of the sport watching, and it’s actually a great way to up the stakes if you think about it from a narrative point of view.

    Besides the little technical errors, it might not be the best representation of the current era of racing (the early 2010s to now). From a meta perspective, this film is neither fictional nor documentary in nature, with a fictional team made up of characters inserted into the real, current world of F1. Put in the context of racing films as a whole, Cars is an entirely fictional movie with fictional characters. Movies like Rush or Ford v Ferrari, other classics in the list of racing films, while exaggerating historical events for drama, are still built with a foundational truth to them. This film falls smack in the middle of those two. There’s no easy solution to this, of course. They couldn’t have created an entirely new grid filled with fictional characters and teams, and creating a narrative around a current driver would defeat the purpose of this film entirely.

    … and the Ugly.
    Unfortunately, getting racing wrong isn’t the worst thing this movie does, because its portrayal of women characters is lacking, to say the least. There are 4 female characters in the film – one in a minor role, two in side roles, and one in the main role.

    Kate McKenna is the technical director of Apex GP, but has her power almost constantly undermined by Hayes, who asks her to change the entire aerodynamics model of the car. The other two female characters of note are Jodie, a mechanic who’s a part of the pit crew, and Bernadette, Joshua’s mother. Bernadette still feels like a fleshed-out character, one whose point is to illustrate the sacrifices that the families of the drivers have to make. Jodie, however, suffers a fate similar to Kate’s. When we first meet her, she’s seen as a mumbling mess in front of a hot-headed Pearce, and not long after, we see how her mistake costs the team a valuable pitstop.

    Taking both Kate and Jodie’s characters together, it feels like this movie goes out of its way to undermine the role of women in the sport, a hot topic in the last couple of years as the sport has gained more popularity. But in 2025, it feels particularly hurtful because of all that women have accomplished in motorsports in the last year alone. From Laura Mueller becoming the first female race engineer for Esteban Ocon of the Moneygram Haas F1 team to F1 Academy gaining massive popularity in its first two seasons, women have come a long way to prove that they belong in motorsports.

    Simone Ashley was also announced to be in the film in July 2024, but by the time the film actually premiered less than a year later, her role was cut down significantly. She was set to play Joshua Pearce’s love interest, but the storyline was entirely cut out. When asked about this, Kosinski stated that this is what often happens in movies and that they “shoot a lot more than they can actually use,” while still praising Ashley. This is, however, a larger trend in the industry that people of colour, especially women of colour, have their roles in production severely cut down by the time the final product makes it to our screens.

    At the end of the day, F1 is a film built for blockbuster entertainment, and it does that very well. It comes at a lot of costs, especially to the history of the sport and how far it’s come. This isn’t even close to Pitt’s best performance in a sports film (see: Moneyball), and for a fair bit, it comes across as a distant legacy sequel to Tony Scott’s Days of Thunder (which came out on the same day in 1990 as the world premiere of this film). Should you still go and watch this film in theatres? Absolutely! And if you so wish, become a fan of the sport itself and immerse yourself in the very rich, often very funny, often quite scandalous world of Formula One.

  • Are Superhero Movies Still Landing?

    Are Superhero Movies Still Landing?

    The Marvel Cinematic Universe’s (MCU) long-awaited Phase 6 kicks off this month with Fantastic Four: First  Steps. Like most of Marvel’s recent movies, Fantastic Four: First Steps also features a star-studded cast, which includes Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach. The film is directed by Matt Shakman, a Marvel veteran, who previously directed Marvel’s WandaVision in 2021. Based on pre-ticket sales, the movie is predicted to earn massively at the box office. Despite this initial hype with pre-ticket sales numbers, previous Marvel projects point to a disconnect between their ambitious output and audience engagement, begging the question: Are we still as excited for big Marvel projects as we used to be?

    Dwindling anticipation is not limited to recent projects, as it affected the entirety of Marvel’s last phase, Phase 5, which came to be the MCU’s least successful phase in terms of revenue generated. Superhero fatigue is real, there’s no denying it, but certain box office successes make a case for the genre being an indispensable part of cinema that generates substantial viewership without sacrificing the craft of filmmaking. Like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, which was a remarkable attempt at exploring one of the MCU’s wittiest characters, Rocket, while successfully developing a dynamic group of characters and their stories.

    A few key reasons explain this decline in enthusiasm, particularly the challenge of keeping up with so many interconnected stories, complicated further by the dual system of series and movies. While it was smart to diversify into shows to adapt to the new OTT environment, the decision also hampered the complex Marvel plotline experience because audiences cannot keep up anymore.  Central to MCU’s brand is the seamless connection of different plotlines over time, but ease of continuity in viewers’ minds is essential for this to work. However, now, there are too many shows to consume, with most getting left behind in the “continue watching” sections of our OTT accounts. The sheer anxiety of consuming the massive volume of content in the Cinematic Universe makes it difficult for audiences to appreciate it.

    Shows allow characters to develop over multiple seasons, so when we transition back to a three-hour movie, the character journeys seem substantially less impactful. Remember Eternals? They were a group of ten superheroes that the MCU introduced back in 2021 with the expectation that audiences would root for them for approximately two and a half hours, only to leave them abandoned.

    The problem with character-building is also evident in instances like Yelena Belova’s character, played by Florence Pugh, who is now leading the ‘New Avengers’ (Thunderbolts*). Unlike her sister, Black Widow, who audiences came to adore even before she had a standalone movie, Yelena’s character was tossed around in a series with Hawkeye and the Black Widow movie, and then suddenly handed the baton to be the next leader.

    Established actors and big names now leading Marvel stories highlight a growing misstep for the franchise. The appeal of earlier characters like Captain America and Thor stemmed mainly from the fact that the actors portraying them were relatively fresh faces, stepping into their roles with almost a clean slate. These allowed the audiences to define the actors by their MCU roles.

    Today, however, stars like Florence Pugh, known for her role in the Dune series; Kit Harington, famous as Jon Snow; David Harbour, a fan-favourite from Stranger Things; and Pedro Pascal, who has become a pop-culture icon and phenomenon, headline Marvel projects. Marvel even brought back Wolverine, played by Hugh Jackman, so that the new Deadpool movie could primarily be not a cinematic success, but a marketing one. Marvel, which was once known for launching actors with unforgettable roles, is now feeding off actors’ stardom to fill theatres. Whether this reliance will pay off remains unclear, as viewers continue to find it challenging to dissociate characters from the actors playing them.

    Marvel’s plotlines have been subject to criticism, particularly for their generic protagonist-turned-villain theme, milked repeatedly with characters like Scarlet Witch in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, Hulk in Avengers: Age of Ultron, and Bucky Barnes in Captain  America: The Winter Soldier. In their defence, the infinite number of superhero movies released every year outside the MCU makes it increasingly difficult to stay original.

    In terms of originality, looking beyond the MCU helps put things in perspective, as a lot can still be done to keep the genre fresh. For instance, Everything Everywhere All at  Once was a unique take on the previously explored metaphor of mothers as superheroes. The animated movie series The Incredibles remains highly entertaining, even though a similar concept was previously explored in Fantastic Four. Moreover, classics like The Dark  Knight trilogy continue to be loved because the movies explore real-world themes using their heroes and villains as funnels to make arguments, and not the other way around. Watching the three Spider-Men reunite was undeniably entertaining, but do we really need Robert Downey Jr. to return as a supervillain?

    Inclusivity and diversity, as demonstrated by the success of Black Panther, have been positive additions to the Marvel universe. However, does representation need to be as overt as seen in Ms. Marvel? Taika Waititi’s Thor: Ragnarok executed comedy brilliantly, but should Deadpool & Wolverine have relied so heavily on humour that the movie felt more like a 2-hour-long stand-up routine? The Marvel Cinematic Universe continues to grow, and its budgets, audiences, and VFX capabilities grow with it. They just need to be more selective and certain about the stories they choose to tell. How they tackle this will determine if the next phase sticks the landing.