Author: Tanisha Dassani

  • Beating Bottomless Budgets

    Beating Bottomless Budgets

    Inflated company valuations and government budgets are not the only thing bogging us down in this economy; the problem has made its way through to the filmmaking industry as well, with production costs rising across genres and formats alarmingly.

    The recently announced Harry Potter TV series for HBO is a reminder of the precedent studios give to bigger projects with popular fan bases, as they funnel money like there is no tomorrow. Some reports have speculated on very high per-episode budgets, though while figures remain unconfirmed, some describe it as around $100 million per episode. To put that into perspective, the original eight-film series had combined production budgets estimated at around $1 billion. Even after considering inflation and the franchise’s popularity, a single season would rival the combined cost of the eight films, and the films themselves raked in more than $7 billion at the global box office, a scale of theatrical revenue that streaming platforms cannot promise.

    The global nature of content now calls for bigger budgets, and this trend now follows in the form of Amazon’s The Rings of Power, which is reported to have cost around half a billion dollars for its first season, making it one of the most expensive TV shows in history. In recent years, feature films have seen similar cost escalation. Reported and estimated budgets include Netflix’s The Electric State ($350 million), Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning Part One (nearly $400 million), Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny ($300 million), and several large Marvel-related projects, like Deadpool & Wolverine (approximately $500 million). These big budgets are often a hit or a miss. 

    Here in India, many films find it difficult to manage the growing scale and ambition. A lack of well-planned production and operations is a major challenge, evident in the cases of Brahmastra and Adipurush, both of which exceeded their original budgets and faced audience dissatisfaction and weaker-than-expected revenue. Budgets also run deep for highly anticipated projects. Controversy aside, in the case of Don 3, Excel Entertainment reportedly incurred losses of around ₹45 crore in pre-production alone.

    A contributing factor is the growing share marketing and promotion occupy in the budget, a new requirement in an increasingly cluttered content landscape. Even indie and small-budget films have their own demons, the kind produced not for high viewership but for critical acclaim. For instance, Anora which won five Academy Awards in 2025, including Best Picture, had a production budget of $6 million but reportedly spent three times that amount on marketing, distribution, and awards campaigning.

    At the center of this problem are studios and streaming platforms. The booming streaming industry initially had the power to bid aggressively for content and drive up prices based on the criteria it set, helping in setting new industry standards. Today, streamers have the resources to produce like studios and create original content, the value of which is harder to determine because traditional metrics like box office revenue do not apply in the same way.

    As for studios, there persist unsustainable norms around blockbusters and how their grandeur is often linked to budgets allocated for locations, VFX, and talent. There is ongoing pressure to keep juicing franchises despite diminishing returns on sequels, like the Fast & Furious Franchise, which has reached narrative saturation but production scale and action sequences continue to grow.

    The days of bottle episodes feel rarer, when we were consuming exceptionally written shows that spanned multiple seasons with hour-long episodes. Now we may wait a year for 8 to 12 episodes only to have forgotten the plot or to find that the studio has canceled the show. Much of this is because it is getting harder to create memorable content and more expensive to increase engagement.

    Bigger budgets should translate to bigger responsibilities and higher standards of quality. The biggest asset we have as moviegoers and subscribers is to appreciate and pay for content that caters to deeper human conditions in contrast to the kind that only feeds off elaborate visuals.

  • Centre Court’s New Classic: A Tale of Fire and Ice

    Centre Court’s New Classic: A Tale of Fire and Ice

    Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier, Manchester United versus Liverpool, the Boston Celtics versus the Los Angeles Lakers, Lin Dan and Lee Chong Wei: Sport thrives on rivalries. Audiences become fans of an athlete’s skill, personality, and consistency, and through that connection find a greater thrill in the game itself. Rivalries bring these audiences together, turning their support into fuel for a sport’s growth. Throughout history, these contests have revolutionised sports, and tennis has been fortunate enough to host many.

    In men’s singles Tennis, multiple rivalries have defined eras, like Borg-McEnroe and Sampras-Agassi, but the most impactful of them all was between Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal. Federer was an elegant powerhouse famous for his effortless game and remarkable single-handed backhand, while Nadal was the “King of Clay”, owing to his high-spinning forehand and near-perfect record on clay. Along with Novak Djokovic, they ruled men’s tennis for nearly two decades. Yet, the Federer-Nadal pairing remained special, built on a foundation of mutual respect and genuine friendship. With Federer’s retirement in 2022 and Nadal’s farewell tour in 2024, the spot for the next big rivalry in tennis was open for contention, and two young stars have quickly taken over.

    First, meet Jannik Sinner. Born in San Candido, Italy, the 24-year-old rose to the top of the men’s standings, achieving the World Number One rank in 2024 after his first Grand Slam win at the Australian Open. Leaving his home at just fourteen to train full-time, he began his development under renowned coach Riccardo Piatti, a mentor to talents like Novak Djokovic and Richard Gasquet. Sinner announced his arrival on the ATP tour in 2019 by winning the Next Gen ATP Finals in Milan. The following year, at age 19, he became the youngest Italian in the Open Era to win an ATP title. Driven by early financial strains, he recently revealed that he had promised his parents he would quit tennis if he wasn’t in the top 200 by age 24. Today, with four Grand Slams and 21 ATP titles to his name, it is safe to say he has surpassed his own expectations.

    Next is Carlos Alcaraz, a 22-year-old Spaniard and the current World Number One. Characterised by his innate talent and aggressive playstyle, Alcaraz has a natural feel for the game. At fifteen, he began his journey under the guidance of fellow Spaniard and former world number one Juan Carlos Ferrero, turning pro a year later at sixteen. A true tennis prodigy, Alcaraz became the youngest male player in history to reach the No. 1 ranking at 19 years of age, following his first major win at the 2022 US Open. Since then, he has acquired five more majors along with 23 ATP titles, and with his young age, this is only the beginning.

    This year, Sinner and Alcaraz have duelled numerous times and their rivalry has electrified the sport. Their first meeting of the season was in the final of the Italian Open, Sinner’s first tournament after facing a three-month ban due to doping. At his home tournament, Sinner played a close match, but ultimately Alcaraz emerged victorious with a scoreline of 7-6(7-5), 6-1. But this was just a teaser for what was coming next.

    At the French Open, Sinner managed to set another final against Alcaraz, where the two made history by playing one of the most extraordinary matches of the decade. Alcaraz made a show-worthy comeback, saving three match points to beat Sinner 4-6, 6-7 (4), 6-4, 7-6 (3), 7-6 (10-2) in the longest French Open final ever at 5 hours and 30 minutes, winning his second consecutive Roland Garros title. Alcaraz also ended Sinner’s unbeaten record at Grand Slam finals, while he protected his own winning streak. The story continued at Wimbledon, the two meeting yet again in the final. Yet this time, Sinner turned the tables and handed Alcaraz, the two-time defending champion, his first loss at a major final 4-6, 6 4, 6-4, 6-4. It was Sinner’s second Slam of the year, winning the Australian Open earlier in January after defeating Alexander Zverev.

    The recent US Open was filled with the likes of Novak Djokovic, Ben Shelton, Taylor Fritz and Lorenzo Musetti providing much more competition, yet for the third consecutive time Sinner and Alcaraz faced off in a Major final. Alcaraz ended the Italian’s streak of 27 slam wins on hard courts to take the title, and in the process splitting the four grand slams between them for two straight years. Alcaraz also dethroned Sinner as the World Number One, ending his 65-week reign at the top.

    These matches are early signs of a brewing rivalry that has the potential to sustain itself for years to come. A year of 5 finals and counting, they have shown a remarkable hold over the ATP tour, nobody else being able to match them in Slams. While Sinner is the more calculated player, grinding down his opponents with immaculate defence and consistent baseline strokes, Alcaraz is extremely aggressive with a variable playstyle, incorporating drop shots and a great net presence into his arsenal. As Sinner himself alluded, Alcaraz brings the “firepower and hot shots,” while he provides the composure of a relentlessly solid player. What more could we ask for? Perhaps the dawn of the next Big rivalry in the sport.

  • Are Superhero Movies Still Landing?

    Are Superhero Movies Still Landing?

    The Marvel Cinematic Universe’s (MCU) long-awaited Phase 6 kicks off this month with Fantastic Four: First  Steps. Like most of Marvel’s recent movies, Fantastic Four: First Steps also features a star-studded cast, which includes Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach. The film is directed by Matt Shakman, a Marvel veteran, who previously directed Marvel’s WandaVision in 2021. Based on pre-ticket sales, the movie is predicted to earn massively at the box office. Despite this initial hype with pre-ticket sales numbers, previous Marvel projects point to a disconnect between their ambitious output and audience engagement, begging the question: Are we still as excited for big Marvel projects as we used to be?

    Dwindling anticipation is not limited to recent projects, as it affected the entirety of Marvel’s last phase, Phase 5, which came to be the MCU’s least successful phase in terms of revenue generated. Superhero fatigue is real, there’s no denying it, but certain box office successes make a case for the genre being an indispensable part of cinema that generates substantial viewership without sacrificing the craft of filmmaking. Like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, which was a remarkable attempt at exploring one of the MCU’s wittiest characters, Rocket, while successfully developing a dynamic group of characters and their stories.

    A few key reasons explain this decline in enthusiasm, particularly the challenge of keeping up with so many interconnected stories, complicated further by the dual system of series and movies. While it was smart to diversify into shows to adapt to the new OTT environment, the decision also hampered the complex Marvel plotline experience because audiences cannot keep up anymore.  Central to MCU’s brand is the seamless connection of different plotlines over time, but ease of continuity in viewers’ minds is essential for this to work. However, now, there are too many shows to consume, with most getting left behind in the “continue watching” sections of our OTT accounts. The sheer anxiety of consuming the massive volume of content in the Cinematic Universe makes it difficult for audiences to appreciate it.

    Shows allow characters to develop over multiple seasons, so when we transition back to a three-hour movie, the character journeys seem substantially less impactful. Remember Eternals? They were a group of ten superheroes that the MCU introduced back in 2021 with the expectation that audiences would root for them for approximately two and a half hours, only to leave them abandoned.

    The problem with character-building is also evident in instances like Yelena Belova’s character, played by Florence Pugh, who is now leading the ‘New Avengers’ (Thunderbolts*). Unlike her sister, Black Widow, who audiences came to adore even before she had a standalone movie, Yelena’s character was tossed around in a series with Hawkeye and the Black Widow movie, and then suddenly handed the baton to be the next leader.

    Established actors and big names now leading Marvel stories highlight a growing misstep for the franchise. The appeal of earlier characters like Captain America and Thor stemmed mainly from the fact that the actors portraying them were relatively fresh faces, stepping into their roles with almost a clean slate. These allowed the audiences to define the actors by their MCU roles.

    Today, however, stars like Florence Pugh, known for her role in the Dune series; Kit Harington, famous as Jon Snow; David Harbour, a fan-favourite from Stranger Things; and Pedro Pascal, who has become a pop-culture icon and phenomenon, headline Marvel projects. Marvel even brought back Wolverine, played by Hugh Jackman, so that the new Deadpool movie could primarily be not a cinematic success, but a marketing one. Marvel, which was once known for launching actors with unforgettable roles, is now feeding off actors’ stardom to fill theatres. Whether this reliance will pay off remains unclear, as viewers continue to find it challenging to dissociate characters from the actors playing them.

    Marvel’s plotlines have been subject to criticism, particularly for their generic protagonist-turned-villain theme, milked repeatedly with characters like Scarlet Witch in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, Hulk in Avengers: Age of Ultron, and Bucky Barnes in Captain  America: The Winter Soldier. In their defence, the infinite number of superhero movies released every year outside the MCU makes it increasingly difficult to stay original.

    In terms of originality, looking beyond the MCU helps put things in perspective, as a lot can still be done to keep the genre fresh. For instance, Everything Everywhere All at  Once was a unique take on the previously explored metaphor of mothers as superheroes. The animated movie series The Incredibles remains highly entertaining, even though a similar concept was previously explored in Fantastic Four. Moreover, classics like The Dark  Knight trilogy continue to be loved because the movies explore real-world themes using their heroes and villains as funnels to make arguments, and not the other way around. Watching the three Spider-Men reunite was undeniably entertaining, but do we really need Robert Downey Jr. to return as a supervillain?

    Inclusivity and diversity, as demonstrated by the success of Black Panther, have been positive additions to the Marvel universe. However, does representation need to be as overt as seen in Ms. Marvel? Taika Waititi’s Thor: Ragnarok executed comedy brilliantly, but should Deadpool & Wolverine have relied so heavily on humour that the movie felt more like a 2-hour-long stand-up routine? The Marvel Cinematic Universe continues to grow, and its budgets, audiences, and VFX capabilities grow with it. They just need to be more selective and certain about the stories they choose to tell. How they tackle this will determine if the next phase sticks the landing.